Exploring spatial-based management scenarios to protect the seafloor in different areas of the Mediterranean Sea

Abstract In recent years, European policies aimed to regulate bottom trawling activities, given the significant environmental damage they cause. Trawling represents a considerable source of income for the economies of many Mediterranean countries. Therefore, it is essential that management measures, including spatial closures, consider the potential long-term consequences of their implementation. This study investigated the impact of different spatial management scenarios on reducing the environmental footprint of bottom otter trawling in four distinct sectors (Western, Southern, Adriatic, and Ionian) of the Mediterranean Sea. Using vessel monitoring systems and logbook data, the study identified core fishing grounds and modelled the effects of various spatial restrictions, including depth-based fishing bans and fishery-restricted areas (FRAs). The results indicate that in all the sectors, the adoption of FRAs does not lead to significant variations in the economic performance of fleets, and the application of the ban over 800 m would allow the protection of a significant portion of the deep-sea bottom with relatively little economic impact. On the contrary, other spatial-based measures lead to different, sector-specific effects. In fact, restricting shallow coastal areas (<6 nm) significantly affects the profitability by reallocating effort to other fishing grounds, with noticeable differences between fleets operating in the same sector (i.e. the Adriatic Sea); meanwhile, bans over 600 or 700 m would determine very different economic effects in the four sectors. Overall, these results suggest that a sole fishery management measure approach is inadequate. Tailored region-specific measures are instead essential to balance ecological sustainability and economic outcomes across different Mediterranean regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf023
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring spatial-based management scenarios to protect the seafloor in different areas of the Mediterranean Sea

Alice Sbrana, Asma Yahyaoui, Anna Nora Tassetti, Germana Garofalo et al.
4 citations
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Marine and fisheries research
4.42
article

Exploring spatial-based management scenarios to protect the seafloor in different areas of the Mediterranean Sea

Alice Sbrana, Asma Yahyaoui, Anna Nora Tassetti, Germana Garofalo, Arnold Rakaj, Igor Isajlović, Evelina Sabatella, Roberto Carlucci, Giuseppe Scarcella, Vasiliki Paraskevopoulou, Vincent Georges, Theodora Paramana, Borut Mavrič, Francesca Ronchi, Marina Pulcini, Saša Raicevich, Nedo Vrgoč, Tommaso Russo, Κalliopi Pagou, Michele Casini, Porzia Maiorano, Simone Galli, Maria Cristina Follesa, Fabio Fiorentino, Chiara Manfredi, Nadia Papadopoulou, Chris Smith, Katja Klančnik, Valentina Lauria, Matteo Stefani, N. Streftaris, Manos Dassenakis
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, European policies aimed to regulate bottom trawling activities, given the significant environmental damage they cause. Trawling represents a considerable source of income for the economies of many Mediterranean countries. Therefore, it is essential that management measures, including spatial closures, consider the potential long-term consequences of their implementation. This study investigated the impact of different spatial management scenarios on reducing the environmental footprint of bottom otter trawling in four distinct sectors (Western, Southern, Adriatic, and Ionian) of the Mediterranean Sea. Using vessel monitoring systems and logbook data, the study identified core fishing grounds and modelled the effects of various spatial restrictions, including depth-based fishing bans and fishery-restricted areas (FRAs). The results indicate that in all the sectors, the adoption of FRAs does not lead to significant variations in the economic performance of fleets, and the application of the ban over 800 m would allow the protection of a significant portion of the deep-sea bottom with relatively little economic impact. On the contrary, other spatial-based measures lead to different, sector-specific effects. In fact, restricting shallow coastal areas (<6 nm) significantly affects the profitability by reallocating effort to other fishing grounds, with noticeable differences between fleets operating in the same sector (i.e. the Adriatic Sea); meanwhile, bans over 600 or 700 m would determine very different economic effects in the four sectors. Overall, these results suggest that a sole fishery management measure approach is inadequate. Tailored region-specific measures are instead essential to balance ecological sustainability and economic outcomes across different Mediterranean regions.

ICES Journal of Marine ScienceVol. 82(3)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Cagliari (IT), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn (IT), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Institute for Water of the Republic of Slovenia (SI), CoNISMa (IT), Banque Nationale de Gènes (TN), Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT), Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies (IT), Istituto di Ricerche Economiche per la Pesca e l'Acquacoltura (IT), National Research Council (RO), Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (GR), National Research Council (IT), Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (HR), Institute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology, University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Marine and fisheries research
4.42
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.