Travel costs and ecologic imprint associated with different fractionation schedules in prostate cancer radiotherapy

Improving the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of healthcare systems has become increasingly relevant in times of climate change, energy transition, an aging population and skyrocketing social costs. The selection of an adequate fractionation schedule is of fundamental importance in the field of Radiation Oncology. We evaluated three internationally established fractionation schedules for definitive prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT) with respect to their ecological and health-economic impacts.We analyzed the data of 109 patients with prostate cancer, who underwent outpatient radiation therapy at Jena University Hospital in 2022. After determination of travel distances between their homes and the treatment facility, carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>)-emissions and taxi costs were calculated for normofractionated RT (39 fractions, A), moderately hypofractionated RT (20 fractions, B) and ultrahypofractionated RT (5 fractions, C).Travel distances of 1616 km (A), 848 km (B) and 242 km (C) were calculated with corresponding costs ranging from 638 € (C) to 4255 € (A). According to the 2024 German physician's fee schedule, 9,604 € would be invoiced for medical treatment and transportation in (A), with transportation costs accounting for 44% of total treatment costs in normofractionated RT. The travel distance, CO<sub>2</sub>-emissions and transportation costs could be reduced by up to 85% by hypofractionation.(Ultra-)hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer has great potential to lower healthcare costs and reduce environmental pollution. Given that and the non-inferiority of oncological outcome and toxicity, hypofractionation should appear beneficial from patient's and healthcare provider's point of view. Current reimbursement structures seem to be inappropriate regarding increased personnel and technical efforts required for highly precise dose application and might hinder comprehensive establishment of ultrahypofraktionated RT in Germany.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Das Gesundheitswesen
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2512-9269
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Travel costs and ecologic imprint associated with different fractionation schedules in prostate cancer radiotherapy

Steffen Weimann, Daniel Medenwald, Christoph Straube, Matthias Mäurer et al.
2 citations
Das Gesundheitswesen
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
article

Travel costs and ecologic imprint associated with different fractionation schedules in prostate cancer radiotherapy

Steffen Weimann, Daniel Medenwald, Christoph Straube, Matthias Mäurer, Klaus Pietschmann, Georg Wurschi, Justus Domschikowski, Maximilian Graf, Marc Münter
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Improving the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of healthcare systems has become increasingly relevant in times of climate change, energy transition, an aging population and skyrocketing social costs. The selection of an adequate fractionation schedule is of fundamental importance in the field of Radiation Oncology. We evaluated three internationally established fractionation schedules for definitive prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT) with respect to their ecological and health-economic impacts.We analyzed the data of 109 patients with prostate cancer, who underwent outpatient radiation therapy at Jena University Hospital in 2022. After determination of travel distances between their homes and the treatment facility, carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>)-emissions and taxi costs were calculated for normofractionated RT (39 fractions, A), moderately hypofractionated RT (20 fractions, B) and ultrahypofractionated RT (5 fractions, C).Travel distances of 1616 km (A), 848 km (B) and 242 km (C) were calculated with corresponding costs ranging from 638 € (C) to 4255 € (A). According to the 2024 German physician's fee schedule, 9,604 € would be invoiced for medical treatment and transportation in (A), with transportation costs accounting for 44% of total treatment costs in normofractionated RT. The travel distance, CO<sub>2</sub>-emissions and transportation costs could be reduced by up to 85% by hypofractionation.(Ultra-)hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer has great potential to lower healthcare costs and reduce environmental pollution. Given that and the non-inferiority of oncological outcome and toxicity, hypofractionation should appear beneficial from patient's and healthcare provider's point of view. Current reimbursement structures seem to be inappropriate regarding increased personnel and technical efforts required for highly precise dose application and might hinder comprehensive establishment of ultrahypofraktionated RT in Germany.

Das GesundheitswesenVol. 87(S 03)
University of Applied Sciences Landshut (DE), Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), University Hospital in Halle (DE), Klinikum Stuttgart (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), University of Lübeck (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.