The perioperative outcomes of papillary versus non‐papillary access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Both papillary and non-papillary access approaches in PCNL show comparable safety and efficacy. While non-papillary access was associated with a slight reduction in operative time and a higher SFR, these findings were not statistically significant.
Authors
- Mohamed M. El Nady (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4269-0620)
- Mohammed Lotfi Amer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-3423)
- Ahmed El-Halaby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5394-2332)
- Sameh Fawzy Elnasharty
- Mohamed Radwan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3169-3548)
Institutions
- Tanta University Hospital (EG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2025-03-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16694
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.59