Modelling Volume‐Outcome Relationships in Health Care

Despite the ongoing strong interest in associations between quality of care and the volume of health care providers, a unified statistical framework for analyzing them is missing, and many studies suffer from poor statistical modelling choices. We propose a flexible, additive mixed model for studying volume-outcome associations in health care that takes into account individual patient characteristics as well as provider-specific effects through a hierarchical approach. More specifically, we treat volume as a continuous variable, and its effect on the considered outcome is modeled as a smooth function. We take account of different case-mixes by including patient-specific risk factors and clustering on the provider level through random intercepts. This strategy enables us to extract a smooth volume effect as well as volume-independent provider effects. These two quantities can be compared directly in terms of their magnitude, which gives insight into the sources of variability of quality of care. Based on a causal DAG, we derive conditions under which the volume-effect can be interpreted as a causal effect. The paper provides confidence sets for each of the estimated quantities relying on joint estimation of all effects and parameters. Our approach is illustrated through simulation studies and an application to German health care data about mortality of very low birth weight infants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10339
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling Volume‐Outcome Relationships in Health Care

Johannes Rauh, Maurilio Gutzeit, Jona Cederbaum, Maximilian Kähler
3 citations
Statistics in Medicine
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
9.39
article

Modelling Volume‐Outcome Relationships in Health Care

Johannes Rauh, Maurilio Gutzeit, Jona Cederbaum, Maximilian Kähler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite the ongoing strong interest in associations between quality of care and the volume of health care providers, a unified statistical framework for analyzing them is missing, and many studies suffer from poor statistical modelling choices. We propose a flexible, additive mixed model for studying volume-outcome associations in health care that takes into account individual patient characteristics as well as provider-specific effects through a hierarchical approach. More specifically, we treat volume as a continuous variable, and its effect on the considered outcome is modeled as a smooth function. We take account of different case-mixes by including patient-specific risk factors and clustering on the provider level through random intercepts. This strategy enables us to extract a smooth volume effect as well as volume-independent provider effects. These two quantities can be compared directly in terms of their magnitude, which gives insight into the sources of variability of quality of care. Based on a causal DAG, we derive conditions under which the volume-effect can be interpreted as a causal effect. The paper provides confidence sets for each of the estimated quantities relying on joint estimation of all effects and parameters. Our approach is illustrated through simulation studies and an application to German health care data about mortality of very low birth weight infants.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(6)
Zimmer Biomet (Germany) (DE)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.