Influence of electrical‐ and gas‐stunned broilers on sensory characteristics and consumer acceptance during chilled storage

Electrical stunning is the most common method of stunning in the poultry industry worldwide, but with a growing demand for prioritizing animal welfare, gas stunning can be an acceptable alternative. This study investigated the effect of electrical and gas stunning on the sensory characteristics and consumer acceptance of chicken breast meat in addition to the impact of packaging type during chilled storage on the flavor of chicken breasts (6 and 18 days for non-vacuum and vacuum packaged, respectively, at 4°C). On Day 0 postmortem, regular chicken consumers (n = 90) were asked to taste oven-baked (165°F, ∼40 min) electrical- and gas-stunned chicken breasts. On Day 3, regular chicken consumers (n = 93) evaluated electrical- and gas-stunned chicken breast meats in two types of packaging (non-vacuum and vacuum). The consumer panels evaluated overall and attribute liking (appearance, aroma, texture, and flavor) on a nine-point hedonic scale and rated intensities of chicken flavor, aftertaste, and juiciness (only Day 3) on a 15-cm line scale. Along with consumer panels, an electronic-nose (E-Nose) was also used to analyze volatile compounds of raw and cooked chicken samples. On Day 0, no significant differences were found between electrical- and gas-stunned chicken breasts, while on Day 3, the only observed significant difference was in juiciness intensity between non-vacuum-packaged chicken breasts but had no impact on acceptance. E-Nose analysis confirmed no differences in aroma between stunning methods. The results suggest that in terms of sensory evaluation, there is no difference in sensory characteristics between stunning methods. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This study can help to provide better direction for the production process and quality of chicken products, as well as animal welfare, by determining how the stunning method and packaging type affect consumers' sensory and analyzing the E-nose for aroma profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70076
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of electrical‐ and gas‐stunned broilers on sensory characteristics and consumer acceptance during chilled storage

Jihye An, Sungeun Cho, Jodie M. Jones, Jacob C. Dees et al.
2 citations
Journal of Food Science
Meat and Animal Product Quality
2.39
article

Influence of electrical‐ and gas‐stunned broilers on sensory characteristics and consumer acceptance during chilled storage

Jihye An, Sungeun Cho, Jodie M. Jones, Jacob C. Dees, Linda S. Barahona‐Dominguez, Michelle Hayden, Ainsley P. Jessup
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Electrical stunning is the most common method of stunning in the poultry industry worldwide, but with a growing demand for prioritizing animal welfare, gas stunning can be an acceptable alternative. This study investigated the effect of electrical and gas stunning on the sensory characteristics and consumer acceptance of chicken breast meat in addition to the impact of packaging type during chilled storage on the flavor of chicken breasts (6 and 18 days for non-vacuum and vacuum packaged, respectively, at 4°C). On Day 0 postmortem, regular chicken consumers (n = 90) were asked to taste oven-baked (165°F, ∼40 min) electrical- and gas-stunned chicken breasts. On Day 3, regular chicken consumers (n = 93) evaluated electrical- and gas-stunned chicken breast meats in two types of packaging (non-vacuum and vacuum). The consumer panels evaluated overall and attribute liking (appearance, aroma, texture, and flavor) on a nine-point hedonic scale and rated intensities of chicken flavor, aftertaste, and juiciness (only Day 3) on a 15-cm line scale. Along with consumer panels, an electronic-nose (E-Nose) was also used to analyze volatile compounds of raw and cooked chicken samples. On Day 0, no significant differences were found between electrical- and gas-stunned chicken breasts, while on Day 3, the only observed significant difference was in juiciness intensity between non-vacuum-packaged chicken breasts but had no impact on acceptance. E-Nose analysis confirmed no differences in aroma between stunning methods. The results suggest that in terms of sensory evaluation, there is no difference in sensory characteristics between stunning methods. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This study can help to provide better direction for the production process and quality of chicken products, as well as animal welfare, by determining how the stunning method and packaging type affect consumers' sensory and analyzing the E-nose for aroma profiles.

Journal of Food ScienceVol. 90(3)
Auburn University (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
2.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.