Riparian buffers mitigate downstream effects of clear-cutting on instream metabolic rates

Clear-cutting of forests with little or no regard for riparian buffers alters the local abiotic habitat of streams within and downstream of clear-cuts by increasing temperature, incident light, suspended sediments and resource inputs such as carbon and inorganic nutrients. It is also well documented that streams with narrow or non-existent riparian buffers affect local stream ecosystem processes. Here, we ask whether ecosystem processes can also be affected downstream of clear-cuts. We tested this in nine headwater streams that run through recently harvested clear-cuts (1-6 years ago) with varying buffer widths (<10 and ≥ 15 m) in northern Sweden. We compared biofilm (periphytic algal and bacterial mats) and whole stream metabolic rates in stream reaches situated upstream of the clear-cuts, in the clear-cuts and downstream of the clear-cuts. We found that biofilm gross primary productivity (GPP) in streams with thin buffers (<10 m) increased, on average, by 54 % downstream of clear-cuts in July, but that the net effect on the whole ecosystem was still a decrease in ecosystem productivity due to high respiration rates. In September, the situation was different as there was a 50 % decrease in biofilm GPP downstream of clear-cuts, and the net effect was again a decrease in ecosystem productivity. Wide buffer zones (>15 m) could mitigate these longitudinal changes for both biofilm and whole stream metabolism, except in one stream that was dominated by fine sediments. Importantly, the magnitude of downstream propagation in biofilm GPP was related to the magnitude of responses in the clear-cut, which in turn was driven by nutrient concentrations. To upscale the potential magnitude of clear-cutting in Sweden, we estimated that nearly 6 % (or 57,400 km) of the total forested stream length is situated within and 100 m downstream of clear-cuts that were harvested 1-6 years ago. Based on this study, we conclude that clear-cut effects on stream ecosystem processes are not only local, but can also be propagated to downstream recipient waters if riparian buffer width in the clear-cut is less than 15 m.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124740
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Riparian buffers mitigate downstream effects of clear-cutting on instream metabolic rates

Lenka Kuglerová, William Lidberg, Larry Greenberg, Maria Myrstener
2 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
4.63
article

Riparian buffers mitigate downstream effects of clear-cutting on instream metabolic rates

Lenka Kuglerová, William Lidberg, Larry Greenberg, Maria Myrstener
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Clear-cutting of forests with little or no regard for riparian buffers alters the local abiotic habitat of streams within and downstream of clear-cuts by increasing temperature, incident light, suspended sediments and resource inputs such as carbon and inorganic nutrients. It is also well documented that streams with narrow or non-existent riparian buffers affect local stream ecosystem processes. Here, we ask whether ecosystem processes can also be affected downstream of clear-cuts. We tested this in nine headwater streams that run through recently harvested clear-cuts (1-6 years ago) with varying buffer widths (<10 and ≥ 15 m) in northern Sweden. We compared biofilm (periphytic algal and bacterial mats) and whole stream metabolic rates in stream reaches situated upstream of the clear-cuts, in the clear-cuts and downstream of the clear-cuts. We found that biofilm gross primary productivity (GPP) in streams with thin buffers (<10 m) increased, on average, by 54 % downstream of clear-cuts in July, but that the net effect on the whole ecosystem was still a decrease in ecosystem productivity due to high respiration rates. In September, the situation was different as there was a 50 % decrease in biofilm GPP downstream of clear-cuts, and the net effect was again a decrease in ecosystem productivity. Wide buffer zones (>15 m) could mitigate these longitudinal changes for both biofilm and whole stream metabolism, except in one stream that was dominated by fine sediments. Importantly, the magnitude of downstream propagation in biofilm GPP was related to the magnitude of responses in the clear-cut, which in turn was driven by nutrient concentrations. To upscale the potential magnitude of clear-cutting in Sweden, we estimated that nearly 6 % (or 57,400 km) of the total forested stream length is situated within and 100 m downstream of clear-cuts that were harvested 1-6 years ago. Based on this study, we conclude that clear-cut effects on stream ecosystem processes are not only local, but can also be propagated to downstream recipient waters if riparian buffer width in the clear-cut is less than 15 m.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 379
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Karlstad University (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.