Denoising Improves Cross‐Scanner and Cross‐Protocol Test–Retest Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis Imaging

The clinical translation of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI)-derived quantitative contrasts hinges on robust reproducibility, minimizing both same-scanner and cross-scanner variability. As multi-site data sets, including multi-shell dMRI, expand in scope, enhancing reproducibility across variable MRI systems and MRI protocols becomes crucial. This study evaluates the reproducibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) metrics (beyond conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)), at the voxel and region-of-interest (ROI) levels on magnitude and complex-valued dMRI data, using denoising with and without harmonization. We compared same-scanner, cross-scanner, and cross-protocol variability for a multi-shell dMRI protocol (2-mm isotropic resolution, b = 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>) in 20 subjects. We first evaluated the effectiveness of Marchenko-Pastur Principal Component Analysis (MPPCA) based denoising strategies for both magnitude and complex data to mitigate noise-induced bias and variance, to improve dMRI parametric maps and reproducibility. Next, we examined the impact of denoising under different population analysis approaches, specifically comparing voxel-wise versus region of interest (ROI)-based methods. We also evaluated the role of denoising when harmonizing dMRI across scanners and protocols. The results indicate that DTI and DKI maps visually improve after MPPCA denoising, with noticeably fewer outliers in kurtosis maps. Denoising, either using magnitude or complex dMRI, enhances voxel-wise reproducibility, with test-retest variability of kurtosis indices reduced from 15%-20% without denoising to 5%-10% after denoising. Complex dMRI denoising reduces the noise floor by up to 60%. Denoising not only reduced variability across scans and protocols, but also increased statistical power for low SNR voxel-wise comparisons when comparing cross sectional groups. In conclusion, MPPCA denoising, either over magnitude or complex dMRI data, enhances the reproducibility and precision of higher-order diffusion metrics across same-scanner, cross-scanner, and cross-protocol assessments. The enhancement in data quality and precision facilitates the broader application and acceptance of these advanced imaging techniques in both clinical practice and large-scale neuroimaging studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Brain Mapping
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70142
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Denoising Improves Cross‐Scanner and Cross‐Protocol Test–Retest Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis Imaging

Gregory Lemberskiy, Steven H. Baete, Benjamin Ades‐Aron, Dmitry S. Novikov et al.
9 citations
Human Brain Mapping
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
12.24
article

Denoising Improves Cross‐Scanner and Cross‐Protocol Test–Retest Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis Imaging

Gregory Lemberskiy, Steven H. Baete, Benjamin Ades‐Aron, Dmitry S. Novikov, Els Fieremans, Santiago Coelho, Timothy M. Shepherd, Jelle Veraart
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The clinical translation of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI)-derived quantitative contrasts hinges on robust reproducibility, minimizing both same-scanner and cross-scanner variability. As multi-site data sets, including multi-shell dMRI, expand in scope, enhancing reproducibility across variable MRI systems and MRI protocols becomes crucial. This study evaluates the reproducibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) metrics (beyond conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)), at the voxel and region-of-interest (ROI) levels on magnitude and complex-valued dMRI data, using denoising with and without harmonization. We compared same-scanner, cross-scanner, and cross-protocol variability for a multi-shell dMRI protocol (2-mm isotropic resolution, b = 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>) in 20 subjects. We first evaluated the effectiveness of Marchenko-Pastur Principal Component Analysis (MPPCA) based denoising strategies for both magnitude and complex data to mitigate noise-induced bias and variance, to improve dMRI parametric maps and reproducibility. Next, we examined the impact of denoising under different population analysis approaches, specifically comparing voxel-wise versus region of interest (ROI)-based methods. We also evaluated the role of denoising when harmonizing dMRI across scanners and protocols. The results indicate that DTI and DKI maps visually improve after MPPCA denoising, with noticeably fewer outliers in kurtosis maps. Denoising, either using magnitude or complex dMRI, enhances voxel-wise reproducibility, with test-retest variability of kurtosis indices reduced from 15%-20% without denoising to 5%-10% after denoising. Complex dMRI denoising reduces the noise floor by up to 60%. Denoising not only reduced variability across scans and protocols, but also increased statistical power for low SNR voxel-wise comparisons when comparing cross sectional groups. In conclusion, MPPCA denoising, either over magnitude or complex dMRI data, enhances the reproducibility and precision of higher-order diffusion metrics across same-scanner, cross-scanner, and cross-protocol assessments. The enhancement in data quality and precision facilitates the broader application and acceptance of these advanced imaging techniques in both clinical practice and large-scale neuroimaging studies.

Human Brain MappingVol. 46(4)
New York University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
12.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.