Adapting the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised with Semantic Cues: Assessing diagnostic utility in a Spanish clinical population

<b>Background:</b> The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) is widely used for assessing episodic memory. In this study, we evaluated the HVLT-R with Semantic Cues (HVLT-R-SC), an adapted version incorporating semantic cues to improve diagnostic utility. The assessment was conducted in a Spanish cohort comprising cognitively unimpaired controls, individuals with multi-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment (md-aMCI), and early Alzheimer's disease (AD). <b>Methods:</b> 684 participants (333 controls, 141 md-aMCI, and 210 early AD) completed the HVLT-R-SC. Effect sizes were calculated to quantify group differences, while Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the test's reliability. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess discriminatory power, with the Area Under the Curve (AUC) summarizing classification accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and efficacy percentages were reported, with optimized cutoff points determined. Odds ratios quantified the association between HVLT-R-SC performance and diagnostic group classifications. <b>Results:</b> Significant differences were observed across all HVLT-R-SC indices among the groups. Total Delayed Recall with and without Semantic Cues exhibited the largest effect size (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.69), with Total Delayed Recall with Semantic Cues demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.90 for differentiating md-aMCI from controls and 0.99 for distinguishing early AD from controls). Optimal cutoffs for Total Delayed Recall with Semantic Cues were 5 words for md-aMCI (sensitivity = 74%, specificity = 90%, efficacy = 85.44%) and 4 words for early AD (sensitivity = 93%, specificity = 97%, efficacy = 95.21%). Significant associations were observed between HVLT-R-SC performance and diagnostic classification, with an odds ratio of 26.04 for md-aMCI and 362.50 for early AD. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), indicating strong reliability of the HVLT-R-SC. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HVLT-R-SC demonstrated strong reliability and excellent diagnostic performance in identifying memory impairments. The inclusion of semantic cues improved diagnostic accuracy, provided clinically actionable cutoff points, and enhanced the test's utility, particularly for detecting md-aMCI and early AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2472443
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised with Semantic Cues: Assessing diagnostic utility in a Spanish clinical population

Valentina Ladera, María Victoria Perea Bartolomé, Jesús Cacho-Gutiérrez, Julián Benito‐León et al.
1 citations
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
article

Adapting the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised with Semantic Cues: Assessing diagnostic utility in a Spanish clinical population

Valentina Ladera, María Victoria Perea Bartolomé, Jesús Cacho-Gutiérrez, Julián Benito‐León, Rosalía García García-Patino, Laura Vicente-González, Ricardo García García, Yinet Cuevas-Pérez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) is widely used for assessing episodic memory. In this study, we evaluated the HVLT-R with Semantic Cues (HVLT-R-SC), an adapted version incorporating semantic cues to improve diagnostic utility. The assessment was conducted in a Spanish cohort comprising cognitively unimpaired controls, individuals with multi-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment (md-aMCI), and early Alzheimer's disease (AD). <b>Methods:</b> 684 participants (333 controls, 141 md-aMCI, and 210 early AD) completed the HVLT-R-SC. Effect sizes were calculated to quantify group differences, while Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the test's reliability. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess discriminatory power, with the Area Under the Curve (AUC) summarizing classification accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and efficacy percentages were reported, with optimized cutoff points determined. Odds ratios quantified the association between HVLT-R-SC performance and diagnostic group classifications. <b>Results:</b> Significant differences were observed across all HVLT-R-SC indices among the groups. Total Delayed Recall with and without Semantic Cues exhibited the largest effect size (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.69), with Total Delayed Recall with Semantic Cues demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.90 for differentiating md-aMCI from controls and 0.99 for distinguishing early AD from controls). Optimal cutoffs for Total Delayed Recall with Semantic Cues were 5 words for md-aMCI (sensitivity = 74%, specificity = 90%, efficacy = 85.44%) and 4 words for early AD (sensitivity = 93%, specificity = 97%, efficacy = 95.21%). Significant associations were observed between HVLT-R-SC performance and diagnostic classification, with an odds ratio of 26.04 for md-aMCI and 362.50 for early AD. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), indicating strong reliability of the HVLT-R-SC. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HVLT-R-SC demonstrated strong reliability and excellent diagnostic performance in identifying memory impairments. The inclusion of semantic cues improved diagnostic accuracy, provided clinically actionable cutoff points, and enhanced the test's utility, particularly for detecting md-aMCI and early AD.

The Clinical NeuropsychologistVol. 40(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Hospital de Niños de la Santísima Trinidad (AR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.