Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques

<h3>Objectives</h3> Lumbar lateral transpsoas interbody fusion is a powerful technique for addressing various spinal pathologies, enabling effective anterior column reconstruction. A critical decision in performing this procedure is selecting the appropriate side for the approach to the lumbar spine, whether in the prone or lateral decubitus position. This article outlines a decision-making framework to assist surgeons in deciding the optimal approach for direct lateral surgery to achieve the desired surgical outcome. <h3>Study Design</h3> Technical note for lateral spinal fusion approaches. <h3>Methods</h3> The article explores anatomical considerations, surgical indications, and patient-specific factors relevant to the choice of approach in lateral lumbar transpsoas fusions. Through case examples, various factors influencing side selection are discussed. <h3>Results</h3> While many traditionally learn and perform direct transpsoas fusions through left-sided approaches, it is essential to consider pertinent anatomical features or variations, surgical pathologies, and patient-specific symptoms. The optimal side of the approach may vary based on these factors and remain key considerations for a holistic decision. <h3>Conclusions</h3> A thoughtful assessment of the factors highlighted here can significantly improve the likelihood of a successful prone or lateral transpsoas fusions. Although comprehensive studies are needed to better guide decisions between right- and left-sided approaches, surgeons currently rely on their clinical judgment and expertise to navigate these choices to maximize safety and efficacy for each patient. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> This study highlights minimizing surgical risk through holistic patient-centered decision-making. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 4.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8721
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques

V Rajkumar, Yi Yuen Wang, Brian Owler
1 citations
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
article

Key Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making on the Side of Approach for Lumbar Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion Techniques

V Rajkumar, Yi Yuen Wang, Brian Owler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> Lumbar lateral transpsoas interbody fusion is a powerful technique for addressing various spinal pathologies, enabling effective anterior column reconstruction. A critical decision in performing this procedure is selecting the appropriate side for the approach to the lumbar spine, whether in the prone or lateral decubitus position. This article outlines a decision-making framework to assist surgeons in deciding the optimal approach for direct lateral surgery to achieve the desired surgical outcome. <h3>Study Design</h3> Technical note for lateral spinal fusion approaches. <h3>Methods</h3> The article explores anatomical considerations, surgical indications, and patient-specific factors relevant to the choice of approach in lateral lumbar transpsoas fusions. Through case examples, various factors influencing side selection are discussed. <h3>Results</h3> While many traditionally learn and perform direct transpsoas fusions through left-sided approaches, it is essential to consider pertinent anatomical features or variations, surgical pathologies, and patient-specific symptoms. The optimal side of the approach may vary based on these factors and remain key considerations for a holistic decision. <h3>Conclusions</h3> A thoughtful assessment of the factors highlighted here can significantly improve the likelihood of a successful prone or lateral transpsoas fusions. Although comprehensive studies are needed to better guide decisions between right- and left-sided approaches, surgeons currently rely on their clinical judgment and expertise to navigate these choices to maximize safety and efficacy for each patient. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> This study highlights minimizing surgical risk through holistic patient-centered decision-making. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 4.

The International Journal of Spine SurgeryVol. 19(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.