[Mendelian randomization study on the causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis].

<b>Objective:</b> To analyze the causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and lumbar bone mineral density and spinal fractures and to further explore the impact of central obesity on the diabetic bone paradox. <b>Methods:</b> A Mendelian randomization (MR) study was implemented. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with type 2 diabetes were selected from the data of genome-wide association studies as instrumental variables, with lumbar bone density and spinal fractures as the outcome variables. The inverse variance weighting method, weighted median method, and MR-Egger regression were applied to identify a causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis at the genetic level. Additionally, to analyze the impact of central obesity in the diabetic bone paradox, the waist-to-hip ratio was introduced as a new exposure variable, with type 2 diabetes and lumbar bone density as outcome variables, and the MR method was applied again to uncover the influencing factors. <b>Results:</b> The screening criteria were based on the three main assumptions of MR. Finally, 62 SNPs for type 2 diabetes and 241 SNPs for waist-to-hip ratio were included in the MR analysis. Using inverse variance weighting as the primary analysis, the causal association effect analysis indicated a causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and increased lumbar bone density (<i>OR</i>=1.047 6, <i>P</i>=0.007) and spinal fractures (<i>OR</i>=1.000 9, <i>P</i>=0.014). A causal relationship between waist-to-hip ratio and type 2 diabetes (<i>OR</i>=1.638 6, <i>P</i><0.001) was identified, indicating that the waist-to-hip ratio was a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and may have a causal association with increased lumbar bone density (<i>OR=</i>1.096 3, <i>P</i>=0.044). This suggests that the waist-to-hip ratio may indirectly affect the relationship between diabetes and osteoporosis. The MR-Egger intercept test showed no horizontal pleiotropy in this study. The leave-one-out analysis indicated that no single SNP had a significant impact on the overall results. Furthermore, the MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test results did not detect any outlier SNPs. <b>Conclusion:</b> MR analysis identified a causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and increased lumbar bone density as well as a higher risk of spinal fractures, a paradox that may be related to central obesity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20241108-00743
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Mendelian randomization study on the causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis].

Yanhui Lu, Fangke Hu, N Li, C L Li et al.
1 links
PubMed
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
article

[Mendelian randomization study on the causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis].

Yanhui Lu, Fangke Hu, N Li, C L Li, Zhibing Li, Haiming Yu
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To analyze the causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and lumbar bone mineral density and spinal fractures and to further explore the impact of central obesity on the diabetic bone paradox. <b>Methods:</b> A Mendelian randomization (MR) study was implemented. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with type 2 diabetes were selected from the data of genome-wide association studies as instrumental variables, with lumbar bone density and spinal fractures as the outcome variables. The inverse variance weighting method, weighted median method, and MR-Egger regression were applied to identify a causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis at the genetic level. Additionally, to analyze the impact of central obesity in the diabetic bone paradox, the waist-to-hip ratio was introduced as a new exposure variable, with type 2 diabetes and lumbar bone density as outcome variables, and the MR method was applied again to uncover the influencing factors. <b>Results:</b> The screening criteria were based on the three main assumptions of MR. Finally, 62 SNPs for type 2 diabetes and 241 SNPs for waist-to-hip ratio were included in the MR analysis. Using inverse variance weighting as the primary analysis, the causal association effect analysis indicated a causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and increased lumbar bone density (<i>OR</i>=1.047 6, <i>P</i>=0.007) and spinal fractures (<i>OR</i>=1.000 9, <i>P</i>=0.014). A causal relationship between waist-to-hip ratio and type 2 diabetes (<i>OR</i>=1.638 6, <i>P</i><0.001) was identified, indicating that the waist-to-hip ratio was a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and may have a causal association with increased lumbar bone density (<i>OR=</i>1.096 3, <i>P</i>=0.044). This suggests that the waist-to-hip ratio may indirectly affect the relationship between diabetes and osteoporosis. The MR-Egger intercept test showed no horizontal pleiotropy in this study. The leave-one-out analysis indicated that no single SNP had a significant impact on the overall results. Furthermore, the MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test results did not detect any outlier SNPs. <b>Conclusion:</b> MR analysis identified a causal relationship between type 2 diabetes and increased lumbar bone density as well as a higher risk of spinal fractures, a paradox that may be related to central obesity.

PubMedVol. 64(3)
Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.