Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fenofibrate in Participants with Mild Hepatic Impairment or with Advanced Fibrosis due to Metabolic‐Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Fenofibrate is contraindicated in patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis due to limited clinical data. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of fenofibrate in participants with mild hepatic impairment (phase 1 study) or advanced fibrosis due to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD; phase 2a study). In the phase 1 study, participants with mild hepatic impairment and healthy matched controls (each n = 10) received a single, oral dose of fenofibrate 48 mg. In the phase 2a study, participants with hypertriglyceridemia and advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD were randomly assigned (1:1) fenofibrate 48 mg (n = 15) or fenofibrate 145 mg (n = 16) combined with firsocostat 20 mg, taken orally once daily for 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed in both studies. In the phase 1 study, the AUC<sub>inf</sub> of fenofibric acid was 25% higher in participants with mild hepatic impairment than in healthy matched participants. In the phase 2a study, the AUC<sub>ss,0-24</sub> of fenofibric acid (fenofibrate 48 mg dose) in participants with F3 fibrosis and F4 cirrhosis was approximately 60% and 80%, respectively, higher than the AUC<sub>inf</sub> in healthy participants in the phase 1 study, and was 20% higher in participants with F4 cirrhosis than in participants with F3 fibrosis. In both studies, most adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were grade 1-2. In the phase 2a study, three participants had grade 3 hypertriglyceridemia. Fenofibrate was well tolerated, and modest differences were observed in fenofibric acid exposure in participants with mild hepatic impairment or advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fenofibrate in Participants with Mild Hepatic Impairment or with Advanced Fibrosis due to Metabolic‐Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Ahmed A. Othman, Islam R. Younis, Cara R. Nelson, Ann Qin et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
article

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fenofibrate in Participants with Mild Hepatic Impairment or with Advanced Fibrosis due to Metabolic‐Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Ahmed A. Othman, Islam R. Younis, Cara R. Nelson, Ann Qin, Timothy R. Watkins, Elijah J. Weber
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fenofibrate is contraindicated in patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis due to limited clinical data. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of fenofibrate in participants with mild hepatic impairment (phase 1 study) or advanced fibrosis due to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD; phase 2a study). In the phase 1 study, participants with mild hepatic impairment and healthy matched controls (each n = 10) received a single, oral dose of fenofibrate 48 mg. In the phase 2a study, participants with hypertriglyceridemia and advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD were randomly assigned (1:1) fenofibrate 48 mg (n = 15) or fenofibrate 145 mg (n = 16) combined with firsocostat 20 mg, taken orally once daily for 24 weeks. Pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed in both studies. In the phase 1 study, the AUC<sub>inf</sub> of fenofibric acid was 25% higher in participants with mild hepatic impairment than in healthy matched participants. In the phase 2a study, the AUC<sub>ss,0-24</sub> of fenofibric acid (fenofibrate 48 mg dose) in participants with F3 fibrosis and F4 cirrhosis was approximately 60% and 80%, respectively, higher than the AUC<sub>inf</sub> in healthy participants in the phase 1 study, and was 20% higher in participants with F4 cirrhosis than in participants with F3 fibrosis. In both studies, most adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were grade 1-2. In the phase 2a study, three participants had grade 3 hypertriglyceridemia. Fenofibrate was well tolerated, and modest differences were observed in fenofibric acid exposure in participants with mild hepatic impairment or advanced fibrosis due to MAFLD.

The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 65(7)
Gilead Sciences (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fenofibrate in Participants with Mild Hepatic Impairment or with Advanced Fibrosis due to Metabolic‐Associated Fatty Liver Disease — Ahmed A. Othman, Islam R. Younis, et al. · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS