Reduced prostate cancer screening has a negative impact on stage migration: the Australian experience

In conclusion, the RACGP guidelines recommending against prostate cancer screening in 2009 correlates strongly with more advanced disease found at RP. This could indicate that patients were presenting later with more advanced disease. However, the increasing use of surveillance of low-grade and favourable intermediate-risk disease and also the potential increasing use of surgery for higher-volume or -grade prostate cancer at diagnosis could impact on the interpretation of our findings. Most international guidelines, as well as the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia Guidelines, have now recommended prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years and it is commendable that the latest 2024 RACGP guidelines have been updated to reflect the new evidence supporting prostate cancer screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Urology
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16654
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reduced prostate cancer screening has a negative impact on stage migration: the Australian experience

Jonathan Kam, Philip Bergersen, Ahmed Goolam, Venu Chalasani et al.
1 links
British Journal of Urology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Reduced prostate cancer screening has a negative impact on stage migration: the Australian experience

Jonathan Kam, Philip Bergersen, Ahmed Goolam, Venu Chalasani, Maxwell Dias, Warick Delprado, Melanie Edwards
article en

Abstract

In conclusion, the RACGP guidelines recommending against prostate cancer screening in 2009 correlates strongly with more advanced disease found at RP. This could indicate that patients were presenting later with more advanced disease. However, the increasing use of surveillance of low-grade and favourable intermediate-risk disease and also the potential increasing use of surgery for higher-volume or -grade prostate cancer at diagnosis could impact on the interpretation of our findings. Most international guidelines, as well as the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia Guidelines, have now recommended prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years and it is commendable that the latest 2024 RACGP guidelines have been updated to reflect the new evidence supporting prostate cancer screening.

British Journal of UrologyVol. 135(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), Sydney Adventist Hospital (AU), Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology (AU), Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reduced prostate cancer screening has a negative impact on stage migration: the Australian experience — Jonathan Kam, Philip Bergersen, et al. · British Journal of Urology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS