Aerosol Delivery to Simulated Spontaneously Breathing Tracheostomized Adult Patients With Heated Humidified High Flow Oxygenation

<b>Background:</b> Heated and humidified high-flow (HHHF) oxygen therapy is frequently used for spontaneous breathing tracheostomized patients. However, the efficacy of in-line placement of nebulizer via HHHF remains unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of nebulizer placements, flow settings, and interfaces on aerosol delivery using a vibrating mesh nebulizer with HHHF in a tracheostomized model. <b>Methods:</b> A simulated spontaneous breathing model of a tracheostomized adult with tracheostomy tube size 8.0 mm was utilized. A collecting filter was placed between the tracheostomy tube and the model lung. Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg/3 mL) was aerosolized via a vibrating mesh nebulizer in-line with HHHF (Airvo2). The aerosol delivery was evaluated with the nebulizer placed distally (near the humidifier) and proximally to the airway, using tracheostomy adapter and tracheostomy collar at gas flows of 15, 30, and 45 L/min. Each condition was tested five times. The drug was eluted from the collecting filter and assayed with ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm). <b>Results:</b> When delivering aerosol via an in-line vibrating mesh nebulizer with HHHF in a tracheostomized model, the inhaled dose increased as flow decreased, regardless of the interfaces and nebulizer placements (all <i>P</i> < .05). With the tracheostomy adapter, distal placement resulted in higher inhaled doses than the proximal placement at all flows (all <i>P</i> < .05). With the tracheostomy collar, inhaled doses were lower with distal placement than proximal placement, except at 15 L/min (21.3 ± 1.9 vs 16.4 ± 2.1%, <i>P</i> = .009). Compared with the tracheostomy adapter, the tracheostomy collar had higher inhaled doses with the vibrating mesh nebulizer placed proximally at 30 and 45 L/min but a lower inhaled dose with the vibrating mesh nebulizer placed distally at 30 L/min. <b>Conclusions:</b> During aerosol delivery via in-line placement of vibrating mesh nebulizer with HHHF in a tracheostomized model, the inhaled dose increased as flow decreased. Distal nebulizer placement resulted in higher inhaled doses than proximal placement with the tracheostomy adapter at all flows and with the tracheostomy collar at 15 L/min.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12467
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerosol Delivery to Simulated Spontaneously Breathing Tracheostomized Adult Patients With Heated Humidified High Flow Oxygenation

Jie Li, Fai A. Albuainain, Xiukai Chen
2 citations
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
3.04
article

Aerosol Delivery to Simulated Spontaneously Breathing Tracheostomized Adult Patients With Heated Humidified High Flow Oxygenation

Jie Li, Fai A. Albuainain, Xiukai Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Heated and humidified high-flow (HHHF) oxygen therapy is frequently used for spontaneous breathing tracheostomized patients. However, the efficacy of in-line placement of nebulizer via HHHF remains unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of nebulizer placements, flow settings, and interfaces on aerosol delivery using a vibrating mesh nebulizer with HHHF in a tracheostomized model. <b>Methods:</b> A simulated spontaneous breathing model of a tracheostomized adult with tracheostomy tube size 8.0 mm was utilized. A collecting filter was placed between the tracheostomy tube and the model lung. Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg/3 mL) was aerosolized via a vibrating mesh nebulizer in-line with HHHF (Airvo2). The aerosol delivery was evaluated with the nebulizer placed distally (near the humidifier) and proximally to the airway, using tracheostomy adapter and tracheostomy collar at gas flows of 15, 30, and 45 L/min. Each condition was tested five times. The drug was eluted from the collecting filter and assayed with ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm). <b>Results:</b> When delivering aerosol via an in-line vibrating mesh nebulizer with HHHF in a tracheostomized model, the inhaled dose increased as flow decreased, regardless of the interfaces and nebulizer placements (all <i>P</i> < .05). With the tracheostomy adapter, distal placement resulted in higher inhaled doses than the proximal placement at all flows (all <i>P</i> < .05). With the tracheostomy collar, inhaled doses were lower with distal placement than proximal placement, except at 15 L/min (21.3 ± 1.9 vs 16.4 ± 2.1%, <i>P</i> = .009). Compared with the tracheostomy adapter, the tracheostomy collar had higher inhaled doses with the vibrating mesh nebulizer placed proximally at 30 and 45 L/min but a lower inhaled dose with the vibrating mesh nebulizer placed distally at 30 L/min. <b>Conclusions:</b> During aerosol delivery via in-line placement of vibrating mesh nebulizer with HHHF in a tracheostomized model, the inhaled dose increased as flow decreased. Distal nebulizer placement resulted in higher inhaled doses than proximal placement with the tracheostomy adapter at all flows and with the tracheostomy collar at 15 L/min.

Respiratory CareVol. 70(7)
Rush University Medical Center (US), First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.