Comparing self‐reported race and genetic ancestry for identifying potential differentially methylated sites in endometrial cancer: insights from African ancestry proportions using machine learning models

While the incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing among all US women, Black women face higher mortality rates. The reasons for this remain unclear. In this study, whole genome differential methylation analysis, along with state-of-the-art computational methods such as the recursive feature elimination technique and supervised/unsupervised machine learning models, was used to identify 38 epigenetic signature genes (ESGs) and four core-ESGs (cg19933311: TRPC5; cg09651654: APOBEC1; cg27299712: PLEKHG5; cg03150409: WHSC1) in endometrial tumors from Black and White women, incorporating genetic ancestry estimation. Methylation at two Core-ESGs, namely APOBEC1 and PLEKHG5, showed statistically significant overall survival differences between the two ancestral groups (Likelihood ratio test; P value = 0.006). Moreover, our comprehensive ancestry-based analysis revealed that tumors from women with high African ancestry exhibited increased hypomethylation compared to those with low African ancestry. These hypomethylated genes were enriched in drug metabolism pathways, indicating a potential link between genetic ancestry, epigenetic modifications, and pharmacogenomic responses. Combining ancestry, race, and disease type may help identify which patient groups will benefit most from these biomarkers for targeted treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Oncology
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.70013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing self‐reported race and genetic ancestry for identifying potential differentially methylated sites in endometrial cancer: insights from African ancestry proportions using machine learning models

Huma Asif, J. Julie Kim
1 citations
Molecular Oncology
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
0.81
article

Comparing self‐reported race and genetic ancestry for identifying potential differentially methylated sites in endometrial cancer: insights from African ancestry proportions using machine learning models

Huma Asif, J. Julie Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While the incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing among all US women, Black women face higher mortality rates. The reasons for this remain unclear. In this study, whole genome differential methylation analysis, along with state-of-the-art computational methods such as the recursive feature elimination technique and supervised/unsupervised machine learning models, was used to identify 38 epigenetic signature genes (ESGs) and four core-ESGs (cg19933311: TRPC5; cg09651654: APOBEC1; cg27299712: PLEKHG5; cg03150409: WHSC1) in endometrial tumors from Black and White women, incorporating genetic ancestry estimation. Methylation at two Core-ESGs, namely APOBEC1 and PLEKHG5, showed statistically significant overall survival differences between the two ancestral groups (Likelihood ratio test; P value = 0.006). Moreover, our comprehensive ancestry-based analysis revealed that tumors from women with high African ancestry exhibited increased hypomethylation compared to those with low African ancestry. These hypomethylated genes were enriched in drug metabolism pathways, indicating a potential link between genetic ancestry, epigenetic modifications, and pharmacogenomic responses. Combining ancestry, race, and disease type may help identify which patient groups will benefit most from these biomarkers for targeted treatments.

Molecular OncologyVol. 19(12)
Northwestern University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.