Evaluation of Environmental Performance of OECD Countries Using SD-Based ARAS and WASPAS Methods

Today, industrialization and technological developments have increased rapidly. Therefore, when evaluated in terms of countries, various problems such as population growth rate, global warming, pollution, environmental destruction, waste and air pollution have become more and more important issues. Countries need to take the necessary precautions and make some improvements in order to eliminate these problems and strengthen their environmental performance. Therefore, it is important to determine the environmental performance of countries. In this context, the aim of this study is to determine the environmental performance levels of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries using ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) and WASPAS (Weighted Aggregates Sum Product Assessment) methods, which are among the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. The data used within the framework of this aim was obtained from the Environmental Performance Index (2022) Report. In order to determine the environmental performance levels of countries, 10 criteria have been determined: climate change mitigation, air quality, water quality, heavy metals, waste management, biodiversity, ecosystem services, acid rain, agriculture and water resources. These criteria have been weighted with the SD (Standard Deviation) method, and rankings have been made with ARAS and WASPAS methods. The ranking results obtained from both methods have been compared. According to the SD weighting method, the criterion with the highest weight is water quality, followed by air quality and acid rain criteria. In addition, according to the results of the analysis made with ARAS and WASPAS methods, the three countries with the highest level of environmental performance in the context of 38 countries included in the analysis are Sweden, Denmark and Finland, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1458807
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Environmental Performance of OECD Countries Using SD-Based ARAS and WASPAS Methods

Emel Gelmez, Eren Özceylan, Hande EREN
4 citations
GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
8.43
article

Evaluation of Environmental Performance of OECD Countries Using SD-Based ARAS and WASPAS Methods

Emel Gelmez, Eren Özceylan, Hande EREN
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Today, industrialization and technological developments have increased rapidly. Therefore, when evaluated in terms of countries, various problems such as population growth rate, global warming, pollution, environmental destruction, waste and air pollution have become more and more important issues. Countries need to take the necessary precautions and make some improvements in order to eliminate these problems and strengthen their environmental performance. Therefore, it is important to determine the environmental performance of countries. In this context, the aim of this study is to determine the environmental performance levels of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries using ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) and WASPAS (Weighted Aggregates Sum Product Assessment) methods, which are among the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. The data used within the framework of this aim was obtained from the Environmental Performance Index (2022) Report. In order to determine the environmental performance levels of countries, 10 criteria have been determined: climate change mitigation, air quality, water quality, heavy metals, waste management, biodiversity, ecosystem services, acid rain, agriculture and water resources. These criteria have been weighted with the SD (Standard Deviation) method, and rankings have been made with ARAS and WASPAS methods. The ranking results obtained from both methods have been compared. According to the SD weighting method, the criterion with the highest weight is water quality, followed by air quality and acid rain criteria. In addition, according to the results of the analysis made with ARAS and WASPAS methods, the three countries with the highest level of environmental performance in the context of 38 countries included in the analysis are Sweden, Denmark and Finland, respectively.

GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCEVol. 38(2)
Selçuk University (TR), İstanbul Sisli Meslek Yüksekokulu (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.