Suggested Prompts for Reflexivity: Navigating Intersectionality in HCI and CSCW Research

Abstract Intersectionality within HCI is often only considered when it is made the topic of the study itself. Whether or not this should be the case is debated, as scope is often something researchers try to outline. This paper argues that reflexivity offers a particularly important solution when it comes to Intersectional HCI combined with the observing, analysing and understanding the impact on interactions between users and the technology, as well as the interactions between the teams building the software. This paper calls for all researchers to consider how race, gender and other protected characteristics may affect their research even when these are not the topics being researched, and to share this data in publication. To facilitate this, this paper presents a series of prompts in the form of usable cards, to aid researchers in carrying out reflective practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interacting with Computers
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwaf007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suggested Prompts for Reflexivity: Navigating Intersectionality in HCI and CSCW Research

Beatriz Severes, Alice Ashcroft, Melissa Martinez-Perez
1 citations
Interacting with Computers
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.94
article

Suggested Prompts for Reflexivity: Navigating Intersectionality in HCI and CSCW Research

Beatriz Severes, Alice Ashcroft, Melissa Martinez-Perez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Intersectionality within HCI is often only considered when it is made the topic of the study itself. Whether or not this should be the case is debated, as scope is often something researchers try to outline. This paper argues that reflexivity offers a particularly important solution when it comes to Intersectional HCI combined with the observing, analysing and understanding the impact on interactions between users and the technology, as well as the interactions between the teams building the software. This paper calls for all researchers to consider how race, gender and other protected characteristics may affect their research even when these are not the topics being researched, and to share this data in publication. To facilitate this, this paper presents a series of prompts in the form of usable cards, to aid researchers in carrying out reflective practices.

Interacting with ComputersVol. 37(5)
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT), Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.