A Model for Resolving Trade Disputes Between Indonesia and Brazil Regarding Imports of Chicken Meat from Brazil According to the World Trade Organization

This study discusses the model of resolving trade disputes between Indonesia and Brazil related to chicken meat imports from Brazil based on World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. The dispute stems from Indonesia's policy of regulating halal standards and restricting imports of Brazilian chicken, which is considered to violate international trade rules, including the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and several other WTO agreements. The formulation of the problem studied is the development of the dispute and the regulation of raw meat imports within the framework of Indonesian law. This study analyzes relevant applicable legal rules, such as Law Number 7 of 1994 and other WTO regulations. The results of the study show that dispute resolution through the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) resulted in a decision that largely won Brazil, although Indonesia managed to maintain policies related to halal certification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law Analytics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijla.v3i1.233
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Model for Resolving Trade Disputes Between Indonesia and Brazil Regarding Imports of Chicken Meat from Brazil According to the World Trade Organization

MM Rendhy Primasesa Sesunan
International Journal of Law Analytics
World Trade Organization Law
article

A Model for Resolving Trade Disputes Between Indonesia and Brazil Regarding Imports of Chicken Meat from Brazil According to the World Trade Organization

MM Rendhy Primasesa Sesunan
article en

Abstract

This study discusses the model of resolving trade disputes between Indonesia and Brazil related to chicken meat imports from Brazil based on World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. The dispute stems from Indonesia's policy of regulating halal standards and restricting imports of Brazilian chicken, which is considered to violate international trade rules, including the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and several other WTO agreements. The formulation of the problem studied is the development of the dispute and the regulation of raw meat imports within the framework of Indonesian law. This study analyzes relevant applicable legal rules, such as Law Number 7 of 1994 and other WTO regulations. The results of the study show that dispute resolution through the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) resulted in a decision that largely won Brazil, although Indonesia managed to maintain policies related to halal certification.

International Journal of Law AnalyticsVol. 3(1)
Universitas Bung Karno (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.