The reliability of goniometric measurement of frontal knee alignment in standing in people with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot study

Objectives Goniometry is a low-cost, high-access measure of frontal knee alignment in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Previous literature has demonstrated the clinical relevance of measuring knee alignment; however, the reliability and associated measurement error of goniometer methods have not been adequately investigated. We sought to evaluate the reliability and measurement error of goniometric measurement of frontal alignment of the knee in standing individuals with KOA. Methods An intra- and inter-rater reliability study design was conducted. Twenty-six individuals with KOA based on clinical and radiological diagnosis criteria were recruited at a tertiary hospital health service. Frontal knee alignment was measured by two examiners (Examiner A, an experienced physiotherapist, and Examiner B, a final-year pre-registration physiotherapy student). Each examiner independently recorded two measures. Reliability, measurement error, and limits of agreement were evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs; 3, k ), standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland–Altman plots, respectively. Results Excellent intra- (ICC = 0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.96) were demonstrated. Inter-rater SEM was 1.20°, while intra-rater SEM ranged between 0.58 and 0.59° for each examiner (MDC95 Examiner A: 1.64°, MDC95 Examiner B: 1.61°). Bland–Altman plots revealed LOA95 of, at worst, 5.8° between examiners and 2.4° for individual raters. Conclusion This study demonstrated excellent reliability (intra- and inter-rater) of goniometric frontal knee alignment measurement in people with KOA. However, to ensure high levels of reliability, measurement methods of alignment need to be standardized between practitioners so that clinical decisions can be confidently made based on this measure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jmsr_502_2024
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The reliability of goniometric measurement of frontal knee alignment in standing in people with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot study

Peter Window, Shaun Patrick O’Leary, Andrew Hislop, Thiv Rodrigo
Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

The reliability of goniometric measurement of frontal knee alignment in standing in people with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot study

Peter Window, Shaun Patrick O’Leary, Andrew Hislop, Thiv Rodrigo
article en

Abstract

Objectives Goniometry is a low-cost, high-access measure of frontal knee alignment in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Previous literature has demonstrated the clinical relevance of measuring knee alignment; however, the reliability and associated measurement error of goniometer methods have not been adequately investigated. We sought to evaluate the reliability and measurement error of goniometric measurement of frontal alignment of the knee in standing individuals with KOA. Methods An intra- and inter-rater reliability study design was conducted. Twenty-six individuals with KOA based on clinical and radiological diagnosis criteria were recruited at a tertiary hospital health service. Frontal knee alignment was measured by two examiners (Examiner A, an experienced physiotherapist, and Examiner B, a final-year pre-registration physiotherapy student). Each examiner independently recorded two measures. Reliability, measurement error, and limits of agreement were evaluated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs; 3, k ), standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland–Altman plots, respectively. Results Excellent intra- (ICC = 0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.96) were demonstrated. Inter-rater SEM was 1.20°, while intra-rater SEM ranged between 0.58 and 0.59° for each examiner (MDC95 Examiner A: 1.64°, MDC95 Examiner B: 1.61°). Bland–Altman plots revealed LOA95 of, at worst, 5.8° between examiners and 2.4° for individual raters. Conclusion This study demonstrated excellent reliability (intra- and inter-rater) of goniometric frontal knee alignment measurement in people with KOA. However, to ensure high levels of reliability, measurement methods of alignment need to be standardized between practitioners so that clinical decisions can be confidently made based on this measure.

Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and ResearchVol. 9
The University of Queensland (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Prince Charles Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.