Within, Between, Forced Choice, or Likert Scale? How Methodological Decisions Influence Recognition Rates in HRI Recognition Studies

Abstract Recognition studies are a mainstay in HRI. Such studies are often used to test whether a robot’s behavior is interpreted as intended by the designer. When designing recognition studies, researchers have to make important methodological decisions about the empirical study design (e.g., within-/between-subject design) and response format (e.g., forced choice, open text). Using the example of emotional expression recognition studies in HRI, we discuss (i) how theoretical conceptualizations determine methodological choices, (ii) the implications of the designs and response formats. We demonstrate in two experiments ( n = 2654 and n = 419) that conclusions drawn from recognition studies are heavily dependent on study design and response format. We conclude with a set of recommendations for researchers employing recognition studies in their research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Robotics
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01231-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Within, Between, Forced Choice, or Likert Scale? How Methodological Decisions Influence Recognition Rates in HRI Recognition Studies

Astrid Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Aleks Pieczykolan, Julia Arndt, Malte Jung et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Social Robotics
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
article

Within, Between, Forced Choice, or Likert Scale? How Methodological Decisions Influence Recognition Rates in HRI Recognition Studies

Astrid Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Aleks Pieczykolan, Julia Arndt, Malte Jung, Maria Pohl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recognition studies are a mainstay in HRI. Such studies are often used to test whether a robot’s behavior is interpreted as intended by the designer. When designing recognition studies, researchers have to make important methodological decisions about the empirical study design (e.g., within-/between-subject design) and response format (e.g., forced choice, open text). Using the example of emotional expression recognition studies in HRI, we discuss (i) how theoretical conceptualizations determine methodological choices, (ii) the implications of the designs and response formats. We demonstrate in two experiments ( n = 2654 and n = 419) that conclusions drawn from recognition studies are heavily dependent on study design and response format. We conclude with a set of recommendations for researchers employing recognition studies in their research.

International Journal of Social RoboticsVol. 17(4)
Cornell University (US), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
RWTH Aachen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.