Scaling up the 3D printing of surgical guides: repeatability and energy efficiency

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the repeatability of the Stereolithography (SLA) process and to provide reliable guidelines to minimize energy consumption without sacrificing part quality. To tackle these aims, an extensive experimental campaign has been conceived: two different machines (of the same model) have been operated in different production environment, specimens and parts with different orientations have been manufactured. Design/methodology/approach A two-step experimental campaign has been carried out. In the first stage, surgical guides were printed with different positions and orientations with respect to the printing plate to investigate the link between energy consumption and printing configuration. In the second stage, the repeatability of the process has been studied, dog bone specimens, accuracy cubes and surgical guides have been printed with two printers operating in two different production environments. Energy consumption, mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy have been measured as reference output to assess the repeatability and the energy consumption of the process. Findings Repeatability was found to be quite stable and reliable by using the same machine in the same production environment. In particular, by varying machine and production environments, variability was found to be low in dimensional accuracy and high for mechanical properties since they are affected by resin temperature, room temperature and the electrical system of the building. Thus, in this study, it was found that the production environment plays a non-negligible role in the output of the manufacturing processes, and it is necessary to be considered especially for scaling up 3D printing. Originality/value Additive manufacturing (AM) parts production for biomedicine represents a prosumer-oriented phenomenon. This market relies on the repeatability of the printing process which is where the AM processes usually fall short. Moreover, this increasing demand needs to be properly managed to pursue sustainable development, thus responsible energy consumption is mandatory. Nevertheless, energy consumption to manufacture 3D printed parts on a large scale represents a non-negligible aspect that still has not been well considered in the literature. The joint investigation of energy consumption, mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy to evaluate the repeatability and energy efficiency of SLA parts represents the novelty of this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-05-2024-0226
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaling up the 3D printing of surgical guides: repeatability and energy efficiency

Ersilia Cozzolino, Natalia von Windheim, Antonello Astarita, Nancy Ames et al.
2 citations
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Anatomy and Medical Technology
1.35
article

Scaling up the 3D printing of surgical guides: repeatability and energy efficiency

Ersilia Cozzolino, Natalia von Windheim, Antonello Astarita, Nancy Ames, Cameron Gygi, Gabriela Del Risco
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the repeatability of the Stereolithography (SLA) process and to provide reliable guidelines to minimize energy consumption without sacrificing part quality. To tackle these aims, an extensive experimental campaign has been conceived: two different machines (of the same model) have been operated in different production environment, specimens and parts with different orientations have been manufactured. Design/methodology/approach A two-step experimental campaign has been carried out. In the first stage, surgical guides were printed with different positions and orientations with respect to the printing plate to investigate the link between energy consumption and printing configuration. In the second stage, the repeatability of the process has been studied, dog bone specimens, accuracy cubes and surgical guides have been printed with two printers operating in two different production environments. Energy consumption, mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy have been measured as reference output to assess the repeatability and the energy consumption of the process. Findings Repeatability was found to be quite stable and reliable by using the same machine in the same production environment. In particular, by varying machine and production environments, variability was found to be low in dimensional accuracy and high for mechanical properties since they are affected by resin temperature, room temperature and the electrical system of the building. Thus, in this study, it was found that the production environment plays a non-negligible role in the output of the manufacturing processes, and it is necessary to be considered especially for scaling up 3D printing. Originality/value Additive manufacturing (AM) parts production for biomedicine represents a prosumer-oriented phenomenon. This market relies on the repeatability of the printing process which is where the AM processes usually fall short. Moreover, this increasing demand needs to be properly managed to pursue sustainable development, thus responsible energy consumption is mandatory. Nevertheless, energy consumption to manufacture 3D printed parts on a large scale represents a non-negligible aspect that still has not been well considered in the literature. The joint investigation of energy consumption, mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy to evaluate the repeatability and energy efficiency of SLA parts represents the novelty of this study.

Rapid Prototyping JournalVol. 31(11)
The Ohio State University (US), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.