Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on obstetric perineal tears

YouTube videos on obstetric perineal tears have only been rated as fairly reliable. We identified the top four videos using the validated DISCERN instrument. Our top four best videos were unpopular because they used medical terms, narrated by physician and the duration was long. Thus, they would be more appropriate to a medical cohort. YouTube videos should be improved to better explain obstetric perineal tears to the public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.03.008
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on obstetric perineal tears

R. Ramanah, Nicolas Mottet, Marc Lallemant, F. Tellier et al.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on obstetric perineal tears

R. Ramanah, Nicolas Mottet, Marc Lallemant, F. Tellier, E. Vignozzi
article en

Abstract

YouTube videos on obstetric perineal tears have only been rated as fairly reliable. We identified the top four videos using the validated DISCERN instrument. Our top four best videos were unpopular because they used medical terms, narrated by physician and the duration was long. Thus, they would be more appropriate to a medical cohort. YouTube videos should be improved to better explain obstetric perineal tears to the public.

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyVol. 308
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Franche-Comté Électronique Mécanique Thermique et Optique - Sciences et Technologies (FR), Université de Franche-Comté (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on obstetric perineal tears — R. Ramanah, Nicolas Mottet, et al. · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS