Differences in vertical and lower-limb joint stiffness in RTS assessments between ACLR patients and non-injured controls

The aim of this study was to establish alterations in vertical and lower-limb joint stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). 127 male patients 8-10 months post-ACLR and 45 non-injured controls performed unilateral and bilateral drop jumps, and cutting, while ground reaction forces (GRFs) and 3D kinematics were recorded. Stiffness and changes in vertical GRF were lower in ACLR patients during bilateral drop jumps compared to non-injured controls. ACLR patients also displayed lower knee stiffness in the bilateral drop jumps (<i>d=</i>-0.91, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>d =</i> 0.53, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively) and cutting (<i>d=</i>-0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>d =</i> 0.19, <i>p=</i>0.040, respectively). In the unilateral drop jump, there were no differences in ankle, knee, or hip stiffness between groups, yet ACLR patients displayed smaller changes in knee moments (<i>d=</i>-0.63, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and decreased knee range of motion (<i>d=</i>0.44, <i>p=</i>0.013). During the bilateral drop jump, ACLR patients displayed lower ankle stiffness (<i>d=</i>0.46, <i>p=</i>0.003) and smaller ankle moment changes (<i>d=</i>0.48, <i>p=</i>0.006), compared to controls. Hence, joint level analysis provides practitioners with a more detailed insight into an athlete's movement strategy following ACLR than whole body analysis. Range of motion, change in moment, and stiffness of the knee joint especially, can help practitioners to assess fitness for return-to-sport in ACLR patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2474340
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in vertical and lower-limb joint stiffness in RTS assessments between ACLR patients and non-injured controls

Isabel S. Moore, Jasper Verheul, Victoria Stiles, Katherine Daniels et al.
1 citations
Journal of Sports Sciences
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
article

Differences in vertical and lower-limb joint stiffness in RTS assessments between ACLR patients and non-injured controls

Isabel S. Moore, Jasper Verheul, Victoria Stiles, Katherine Daniels, Holly S. R. Jones
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish alterations in vertical and lower-limb joint stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). 127 male patients 8-10 months post-ACLR and 45 non-injured controls performed unilateral and bilateral drop jumps, and cutting, while ground reaction forces (GRFs) and 3D kinematics were recorded. Stiffness and changes in vertical GRF were lower in ACLR patients during bilateral drop jumps compared to non-injured controls. ACLR patients also displayed lower knee stiffness in the bilateral drop jumps (<i>d=</i>-0.91, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>d =</i> 0.53, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively) and cutting (<i>d=</i>-0.85, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>d =</i> 0.19, <i>p=</i>0.040, respectively). In the unilateral drop jump, there were no differences in ankle, knee, or hip stiffness between groups, yet ACLR patients displayed smaller changes in knee moments (<i>d=</i>-0.63, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and decreased knee range of motion (<i>d=</i>0.44, <i>p=</i>0.013). During the bilateral drop jump, ACLR patients displayed lower ankle stiffness (<i>d=</i>0.46, <i>p=</i>0.003) and smaller ankle moment changes (<i>d=</i>0.48, <i>p=</i>0.006), compared to controls. Hence, joint level analysis provides practitioners with a more detailed insight into an athlete's movement strategy following ACLR than whole body analysis. Range of motion, change in moment, and stiffness of the knee joint especially, can help practitioners to assess fitness for return-to-sport in ACLR patients.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 43(8)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Bangor University
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.