The Impact of a Novel Use of Volunteers on Patient Satisfaction

A novel volunteer program was implemented in the adult emergency department waiting room to combat declining patient satisfaction, a crucial quality metric impacting everything from hospital reimbursement to clinical outcomes. Net Promotor Scores (NPS) were tracked in a retrospective cohort design, with patients interacting with volunteers serving as the intervention cohort and those who did not serving as control. Analysis using monthly NPS means was conducted from 2022 to 2023. The absolute difference in NPS between the 2 groups was 17.43. Using monthly means, an unpaired t -test was conducted. NPS in the intervention group was 51.86 with a standard deviation of 7.01. NPS in the control was 34.43 with a standard deviation of 5.32. Data is significant, with P = 0.0002. This emergency department waiting room volunteer program led to increases in patient satisfaction. Study authors think similar effects are achievable at other institutions, and future trials would be beneficial in confirming this suspected causal relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Medical Quality
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jmq.0000000000000232
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of a Novel Use of Volunteers on Patient Satisfaction

John K. Marshall, Haley Manella
American Journal of Medical Quality
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

The Impact of a Novel Use of Volunteers on Patient Satisfaction

John K. Marshall, Haley Manella
article en

Abstract

A novel volunteer program was implemented in the adult emergency department waiting room to combat declining patient satisfaction, a crucial quality metric impacting everything from hospital reimbursement to clinical outcomes. Net Promotor Scores (NPS) were tracked in a retrospective cohort design, with patients interacting with volunteers serving as the intervention cohort and those who did not serving as control. Analysis using monthly NPS means was conducted from 2022 to 2023. The absolute difference in NPS between the 2 groups was 17.43. Using monthly means, an unpaired t -test was conducted. NPS in the intervention group was 51.86 with a standard deviation of 7.01. NPS in the control was 34.43 with a standard deviation of 5.32. Data is significant, with P = 0.0002. This emergency department waiting room volunteer program led to increases in patient satisfaction. Study authors think similar effects are achievable at other institutions, and future trials would be beneficial in confirming this suspected causal relationship.

American Journal of Medical QualityVol. 40(3)
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.