Magnetic sense-dependent probabilistic decision-making in humans

Even though it is not well characterized how much humans can sense the geomagnetic field (GMF), numerous magnetosensitive animals can detect GMF broadly as a sensory cue, when a spatial decision-making is needed for orientation or migration. In an article of recent series of studies, we showed that the empirical probabilities of stone selections in Go game were significantly different from the theoretical probability. In this study, we assessed the implication of the GMF in modulating subconscious non-spatial decision-making in human subjects and the underlying mechanism with exploiting the zero-sum binary stone selection of Go game as a proof-of-principle. In a laboratory setting, the experimental probability in a decision-making was significantly hampered by the cancelation of the ambient GMF. Moreover, the attenuation of decision-making was confirmed by a specific range of magnetic resonance radiofrequency. In numerous stone selection games among amateur Go players in the artificial magnetic field setting, the analyses of stone selection rate by trials and steps for decision-making pinpointed the subconscious stone selection as a primary modulating target in the binary decision-making. Our findings may provide unique insights into the impact of sensing GMF in probabilistic decision-making in which theoretical probability is manifested into empirical probability through a magnetic field resonance-dependent mechanism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1497021
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetic sense-dependent probabilistic decision-making in humans

Kwon Seok Chae, Soo‐Chan Kim, Yongkuk Kim, In‐Taek Oh et al.
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Magnetic sense-dependent probabilistic decision-making in humans

Kwon Seok Chae, Soo‐Chan Kim, Yongkuk Kim, In‐Taek Oh, Yong‐Hwan Kim
article en

Abstract

Even though it is not well characterized how much humans can sense the geomagnetic field (GMF), numerous magnetosensitive animals can detect GMF broadly as a sensory cue, when a spatial decision-making is needed for orientation or migration. In an article of recent series of studies, we showed that the empirical probabilities of stone selections in Go game were significantly different from the theoretical probability. In this study, we assessed the implication of the GMF in modulating subconscious non-spatial decision-making in human subjects and the underlying mechanism with exploiting the zero-sum binary stone selection of Go game as a proof-of-principle. In a laboratory setting, the experimental probability in a decision-making was significantly hampered by the cancelation of the ambient GMF. Moreover, the attenuation of decision-making was confirmed by a specific range of magnetic resonance radiofrequency. In numerous stone selection games among amateur Go players in the artificial magnetic field setting, the analyses of stone selection rate by trials and steps for decision-making pinpointed the subconscious stone selection as a primary modulating target in the binary decision-making. Our findings may provide unique insights into the impact of sensing GMF in probabilistic decision-making in which theoretical probability is manifested into empirical probability through a magnetic field resonance-dependent mechanism.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 19
Hankyong National University (KR), Boise State University (US), Kyungpook National University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.