Performance Analysis of Residual Networks for Pneumonia Diagnosis on Chest X-Rays

ResNets have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in image classification tasks, making them a promising tool for clinical applications. This study evaluates the performance of deep learning Residual Networks (ResNets) in classifying chest X-ray images for pneumonia diagnosis. Five ResNet variants: ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, and ResNet152 are compared on their performance training on the same dataset of chest X-ray images, which included positive and negative diagnoses. The models were trained on a subset of images and tested on a separate set to assess their accuracy and consistency. Our results indicate that ResNet50 achieves the highest accuracy in predictions, while ResNet34 demonstrates the most consistent performance across trials. These findings provide valuable insights into selecting the most suitable ResNet variant for binary classification tasks involving chest X-rays, particularly when considering factors such as computational resource availability and accuracy requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Computational Engineering
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2025.21363
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Analysis of Residual Networks for Pneumonia Diagnosis on Chest X-Rays

tianjing zhang
Applied and Computational Engineering
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Performance Analysis of Residual Networks for Pneumonia Diagnosis on Chest X-Rays

tianjing zhang
article en

Abstract

ResNets have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in image classification tasks, making them a promising tool for clinical applications. This study evaluates the performance of deep learning Residual Networks (ResNets) in classifying chest X-ray images for pneumonia diagnosis. Five ResNet variants: ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, and ResNet152 are compared on their performance training on the same dataset of chest X-ray images, which included positive and negative diagnoses. The models were trained on a subset of images and tested on a separate set to assess their accuracy and consistency. Our results indicate that ResNet50 achieves the highest accuracy in predictions, while ResNet34 demonstrates the most consistent performance across trials. These findings provide valuable insights into selecting the most suitable ResNet variant for binary classification tasks involving chest X-rays, particularly when considering factors such as computational resource availability and accuracy requirements.

Applied and Computational EngineeringVol. 138(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Analysis of Residual Networks for Pneumonia Diagnosis on Chest X-Rays — tianjing zhang · Applied and Computational Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS