Survey Practice in Non-Survey-Literate Populations: Lessons Learned from a Cognitive Interview Study in Brazil

Survey research relies on cooperation and coordination between researchers and respondents. Survey-literate respondents possess a level of understanding of the survey process that facilitates their participation. Non-survey-literate respondents, on the other hand, are less equipped to provide accurate responses, which can lead to increased survey error. In this article, we present findings from a cognitive interview project conducted in Brazil to illustrate potential barriers to respondent participation and demonstrate how these barriers contribute to response error. To test questions on inclusive education, researchers from the Collaborating Center for Questionnaire Design and Evaluation Research at the National Center for Health Statistics facilitated the collection of data through 80 cognitive interviews conducted in various neighborhoods in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Recruitment targeted caregivers of children with and without disabilities, and respondents were predominantly female with low literacy levels. The results indicated that respondents with limited familiarity with the survey process (non-survey-literate) struggled to orient themselves to the survey task. They faced challenges in choosing response options, understanding scale relationships, and interpreting vocabulary. Additionally, many respondents expressed a need to share salient details of their lives, which the survey was not designed to capture. Understanding these barriers to participation and identifying ways to mitigate them can help reduce survey error, particularly in vulnerable populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Survey Practice
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2024-0035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey Practice in Non-Survey-Literate Populations: Lessons Learned from a Cognitive Interview Study in Brazil

Meredith Massey
1 citations
Survey Practice
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
article

Survey Practice in Non-Survey-Literate Populations: Lessons Learned from a Cognitive Interview Study in Brazil

Meredith Massey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Survey research relies on cooperation and coordination between researchers and respondents. Survey-literate respondents possess a level of understanding of the survey process that facilitates their participation. Non-survey-literate respondents, on the other hand, are less equipped to provide accurate responses, which can lead to increased survey error. In this article, we present findings from a cognitive interview project conducted in Brazil to illustrate potential barriers to respondent participation and demonstrate how these barriers contribute to response error. To test questions on inclusive education, researchers from the Collaborating Center for Questionnaire Design and Evaluation Research at the National Center for Health Statistics facilitated the collection of data through 80 cognitive interviews conducted in various neighborhoods in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Recruitment targeted caregivers of children with and without disabilities, and respondents were predominantly female with low literacy levels. The results indicated that respondents with limited familiarity with the survey process (non-survey-literate) struggled to orient themselves to the survey task. They faced challenges in choosing response options, understanding scale relationships, and interpreting vocabulary. Additionally, many respondents expressed a need to share salient details of their lives, which the survey was not designed to capture. Understanding these barriers to participation and identifying ways to mitigate them can help reduce survey error, particularly in vulnerable populations.

Survey PracticeVol. 19(S1)
National Center for Health Research (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Survey Practice in Non-Survey-Literate Populations: Lessons Learned from a Cognitive Interview Study in Brazil — Meredith Massey · Survey Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS