Deriving leaf-scale chlorophyll index (CIleaf) from canopy reflectance by correcting for the canopy multiple scattering based on spectral invariant theory

Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a crucial biochemical parameter for monitoring the plant's nutritional status and photosynthetic capacity. However, retrieving LCC from canopy reflectance is challenging due to the coupling influence of LCC and canopy structure, particularly leaf area index (LAI). The isolation of leaf-scale information from canopy signals is therefore essential to improve the LCC estimation. This study proposed an approach for deriving the leaf-scale chlorophyll index (CI leaf ) from the canopy bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) based on the spectral invariant theory ( p -theory). Six widely used canopy-scale chlorophyll indices (CI canopy ) were selected to derive the corresponding CI leaf . The CI leaf is expressed as the product of its original CI canopy and a scale conversion factor (SCF) (CI leaf = CI canopy × SCF). The SCF is determined by two spectral invariants of p -theory (recollision probability p and directional area scattering factor DASF), as well as canopy BRFs at specific wavelengths, and it corrects for the contribution of canopy multiple scattering to CI canopy . The analysis through radiative transfer model simulations showed that CI leaf exhibited more unified relationships with LCC across LAI conditions than the original CI canopy and substantially eliminated the influence of LAI on the CI-based model. Validation results demonstrated that CI leaf improved the accuracy of LCC estimation compared to CI canopy . The leaf-scale MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index (MTCI leaf ) exhibited the most prominent improvements, reducing the root-mean-square error (RMSE) by 6.68 μg/cm 2 for ground spectra and 2.33–4.21 μg/cm 2 for Sentinel-2 images with multi-ecosystem datasets. Additionally, the influence of vegetation types on the CI-based model was mitigated by CI leaf . MTCI leaf reduced the RMSE values by 3.8 %–34.0 % for different plant functional types, giving more consistent accuracies across species than MTCI canopy . Our results show that the proposed CI leaf combines the robustness of the physically-based method with the simplicity of the CI-based method, thus providing a practical approach for large-scale high-resolution LCC mapping. Moreover, the method holds promise for designing leaf-scale vegetation indices sensitive to various leaf biochemical parameters beyond LCC, extending its utility to broader leaf-scale remote sensing retrieval (e.g., leaf carotenoid content and leaf dry mass). • Leaf-scale chlorophyll index (CI leaf ) is derived from canopy reflectance. • Spectral invariant theory is used to correct for canopy multiple scattering. • CI leaf exhibits more unified relationships with LCC across LAI conditions. • CI leaf outperforms canopy-scale chlorophyll index (CI canopy ) to retrieve LCC. • The CI leaf -based method is generic and efficient for LCC mapping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing of Environment
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114692
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deriving leaf-scale chlorophyll index (CIleaf) from canopy reflectance by correcting for the canopy multiple scattering based on spectral invariant theory

Faisal Mumtaz, Hu Zhang, Qinhuo Liu, Wentao Yu et al.
1 citations
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Deriving leaf-scale chlorophyll index (CIleaf) from canopy reflectance by correcting for the canopy multiple scattering based on spectral invariant theory

Faisal Mumtaz, Hu Zhang, Qinhuo Liu, Wentao Yu, Shangrong Lin, Chang Liu, Alfredo Huete, Hongliang Fang, Chenpeng Gu, Yadong Dong, Xiaohan Wang, Jing Li, Li Guan, Liangyun Liu, Junhua Bai, Jing Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is a crucial biochemical parameter for monitoring the plant's nutritional status and photosynthetic capacity. However, retrieving LCC from canopy reflectance is challenging due to the coupling influence of LCC and canopy structure, particularly leaf area index (LAI). The isolation of leaf-scale information from canopy signals is therefore essential to improve the LCC estimation. This study proposed an approach for deriving the leaf-scale chlorophyll index (CI leaf ) from the canopy bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) based on the spectral invariant theory ( p -theory). Six widely used canopy-scale chlorophyll indices (CI canopy ) were selected to derive the corresponding CI leaf . The CI leaf is expressed as the product of its original CI canopy and a scale conversion factor (SCF) (CI leaf = CI canopy × SCF). The SCF is determined by two spectral invariants of p -theory (recollision probability p and directional area scattering factor DASF), as well as canopy BRFs at specific wavelengths, and it corrects for the contribution of canopy multiple scattering to CI canopy . The analysis through radiative transfer model simulations showed that CI leaf exhibited more unified relationships with LCC across LAI conditions than the original CI canopy and substantially eliminated the influence of LAI on the CI-based model. Validation results demonstrated that CI leaf improved the accuracy of LCC estimation compared to CI canopy . The leaf-scale MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index (MTCI leaf ) exhibited the most prominent improvements, reducing the root-mean-square error (RMSE) by 6.68 μg/cm 2 for ground spectra and 2.33–4.21 μg/cm 2 for Sentinel-2 images with multi-ecosystem datasets. Additionally, the influence of vegetation types on the CI-based model was mitigated by CI leaf . MTCI leaf reduced the RMSE values by 3.8 %–34.0 % for different plant functional types, giving more consistent accuracies across species than MTCI canopy . Our results show that the proposed CI leaf combines the robustness of the physically-based method with the simplicity of the CI-based method, thus providing a practical approach for large-scale high-resolution LCC mapping. Moreover, the method holds promise for designing leaf-scale vegetation indices sensitive to various leaf biochemical parameters beyond LCC, extending its utility to broader leaf-scale remote sensing retrieval (e.g., leaf carotenoid content and leaf dry mass). • Leaf-scale chlorophyll index (CI leaf ) is derived from canopy reflectance. • Spectral invariant theory is used to correct for canopy multiple scattering. • CI leaf exhibits more unified relationships with LCC across LAI conditions. • CI leaf outperforms canopy-scale chlorophyll index (CI canopy ) to retrieve LCC. • The CI leaf -based method is generic and efficient for LCC mapping.

Remote Sensing of EnvironmentVol. 322
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Beijing Institute of Big Data Research (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.