Evaluating soil erosion zones in the Kangsabati River basin using a stacking framework and SHAP model: a comparative study of machine learning approaches

Soil erosion is a major concern in the Kangsabati River basin, necessitating a comprehensive scientific approach for effective soil erosion management. This study aimed to predict soil erosion susceptibility zones in the basin using integrated soil erosion and deep learning (DL) based stacking framework. Additionally, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) model was utilized to augment the interpretability of the DL model. The study employed the RUSLE model to estimate the soil loss. Through ArcGIS, 2000 erosion sites and 2000 non-erosion sites were randomly selected to generate an inventory map. The study considered 17 factors in four primary categories: topographic, climatic, soil, and land use/land cover (LULC). The Boruta algorithm assessed the importance of these variables. Random Forest (RF), (Deep Neural Networks) DNN, Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and stacking (Meta model) models were used to map soil erosion susceptibility based on the inventory map and controlling features. The RUSLE model revealed five erosion zones with soil loss rates ranging from very low (less than 9 t/ha/year) to very high (above 43 t/ha/year). The results demonstrated that 24.93% of the study area fell within the very high erosion susceptibility zone as predicted by DNN, while RF identified 34.32%, Meta model identified 24.84%, and CNN indicated 10.47% of the study area falling into the very high erosion susceptibility category. In terms of RMSE (value) and MSE, the Meta model demonstrates superior performance, whereas the DNN model excels in terms of MAE. The SHAP values output highlights the substantial impact of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), the K factor, soil moisture, and elevation on the DNN model. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing strategies and policies to combat soil erosion in the Kangsabati River basin, aiding targeted interventions and sustainable land management decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sciences Europe
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01079-9
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating soil erosion zones in the Kangsabati River basin using a stacking framework and SHAP model: a comparative study of machine learning approaches

Javed Mallick, Hazem Ghassan Abdo, Saeed Alqadhi, Md Nawaj Sarif et al.
5 citations
Environmental Sciences Europe
Soil erosion and sediment transport
5.93
article

Evaluating soil erosion zones in the Kangsabati River basin using a stacking framework and SHAP model: a comparative study of machine learning approaches

Javed Mallick, Hazem Ghassan Abdo, Saeed Alqadhi, Md Nawaj Sarif, Swapan Talukdar, Tania Nasrin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Soil erosion is a major concern in the Kangsabati River basin, necessitating a comprehensive scientific approach for effective soil erosion management. This study aimed to predict soil erosion susceptibility zones in the basin using integrated soil erosion and deep learning (DL) based stacking framework. Additionally, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) model was utilized to augment the interpretability of the DL model. The study employed the RUSLE model to estimate the soil loss. Through ArcGIS, 2000 erosion sites and 2000 non-erosion sites were randomly selected to generate an inventory map. The study considered 17 factors in four primary categories: topographic, climatic, soil, and land use/land cover (LULC). The Boruta algorithm assessed the importance of these variables. Random Forest (RF), (Deep Neural Networks) DNN, Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and stacking (Meta model) models were used to map soil erosion susceptibility based on the inventory map and controlling features. The RUSLE model revealed five erosion zones with soil loss rates ranging from very low (less than 9 t/ha/year) to very high (above 43 t/ha/year). The results demonstrated that 24.93% of the study area fell within the very high erosion susceptibility zone as predicted by DNN, while RF identified 34.32%, Meta model identified 24.84%, and CNN indicated 10.47% of the study area falling into the very high erosion susceptibility category. In terms of RMSE (value) and MSE, the Meta model demonstrates superior performance, whereas the DNN model excels in terms of MAE. The SHAP values output highlights the substantial impact of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), the K factor, soil moisture, and elevation on the DNN model. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing strategies and policies to combat soil erosion in the Kangsabati River basin, aiding targeted interventions and sustainable land management decisions.

Environmental Sciences EuropeVol. 37(1)
University of Calcutta (IN), Jamia Millia Islamia (IN), King Khalid University (SA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
5.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.