Differential Item Functioning for Gender and Age of the DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria in a Large Clinical Sample

Abstract This study examined the DSM-IV/DSM-5 Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in a clinical sample of 4102 patients (845 diagnosed with BPD) using Item Response Theory analysis, with special emphasis on Differential Item Functioning (DIF) across gender and age. Among the three criteria that displayed DIF for age, Fear of abandonment and Self-injurious behavior were more frequently assigned to female patients as compared with male patients situated at the same position on the latent BPD scale. Uncontrolled anger was more commonly attributed to male patients at equivalent levels of latent BPD severity. For age, DIF was present for five criteria. Self-injurious behavior and Affective instability were more prevalent in the younger age group (18–25), given the same severity levels as the older age group. Conversely, Unstable relationships, Impulsivity, and Dissociation were more frequently identified in older patients. Identity problems showed no DIF and had good discriminative ability. The results were interpreted in light of the view that BPD is a proxy for general personality pathology severity. As such, the behavioral-oriented criteria, notably Self-injurious behavior and Uncontrolled anger, posed the most challenges in terms of DIF, and caution is advised in using these criteria to assess general severity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-024-10183-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Item Functioning for Gender and Age of the DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria in a Large Clinical Sample

Muirne C. S. Paap, Tuva Langjord, Espen Jan Folmo, Geir Pedersen et al.
1 citations
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
2.31
article

Differential Item Functioning for Gender and Age of the DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder Criteria in a Large Clinical Sample

Muirne C. S. Paap, Tuva Langjord, Espen Jan Folmo, Geir Pedersen, Benjamin Hummelen, Johan Braeken
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the DSM-IV/DSM-5 Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in a clinical sample of 4102 patients (845 diagnosed with BPD) using Item Response Theory analysis, with special emphasis on Differential Item Functioning (DIF) across gender and age. Among the three criteria that displayed DIF for age, Fear of abandonment and Self-injurious behavior were more frequently assigned to female patients as compared with male patients situated at the same position on the latent BPD scale. Uncontrolled anger was more commonly attributed to male patients at equivalent levels of latent BPD severity. For age, DIF was present for five criteria. Self-injurious behavior and Affective instability were more prevalent in the younger age group (18–25), given the same severity levels as the older age group. Conversely, Unstable relationships, Impulsivity, and Dissociation were more frequently identified in older patients. Identity problems showed no DIF and had good discriminative ability. The results were interpreted in light of the view that BPD is a proxy for general personality pathology severity. As such, the behavioral-oriented criteria, notably Self-injurious behavior and Uncontrolled anger, posed the most challenges in terms of DIF, and caution is advised in using these criteria to assess general severity.

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral AssessmentVol. 47(1)
INSEAD (FR), Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Groningen (NL), University of Oslo (NO)
Universitetet i Oslo
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.