¿Son los pueblos indígenas comunidades políticas legítimas? Una reflexión desde la filosofía política contemporánea frente a la propuesta de reforma constitucional de 2024

The following article addresses the way in which the definition of the term “indigenous people” presents a striking ambiguity, and this generates diverse political, legal and cultural implications throughout Mexican territory. This can make it difficult to guarantee the human rights of specific peoples, especially the right to autonomy and self-determination. Therefore, based on thinkers who have reflected on our country, as well as other authors of communitarian or liberal tradition, this text explores the challenge implied by the absence of a strategy that legally recognizes communities, legitimate political entities that have specific rights. In this sense, the main objective of the article is to contribute to clarifying the concept of “indigenous people” within a contemporary philosophical debate, promoting intercultural justice that ensures the rights of indigenous peoples in Mexico.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conocimiento y Acción
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21555/cya.v4.i2.3314
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

¿Son los pueblos indígenas comunidades políticas legítimas? Una reflexión desde la filosofía política contemporánea frente a la propuesta de reforma constitucional de 2024

Sandra Anchondo Pavón, Enrique Camacho Beltrán
Conocimiento y Acción
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
article

¿Son los pueblos indígenas comunidades políticas legítimas? Una reflexión desde la filosofía política contemporánea frente a la propuesta de reforma constitucional de 2024

Sandra Anchondo Pavón, Enrique Camacho Beltrán
article en

Abstract

The following article addresses the way in which the definition of the term “indigenous people” presents a striking ambiguity, and this generates diverse political, legal and cultural implications throughout Mexican territory. This can make it difficult to guarantee the human rights of specific peoples, especially the right to autonomy and self-determination. Therefore, based on thinkers who have reflected on our country, as well as other authors of communitarian or liberal tradition, this text explores the challenge implied by the absence of a strategy that legally recognizes communities, legitimate political entities that have specific rights. In this sense, the main objective of the article is to contribute to clarifying the concept of “indigenous people” within a contemporary philosophical debate, promoting intercultural justice that ensures the rights of indigenous peoples in Mexico.

Conocimiento y AcciónVol. 4(2)
Universidad Panamericana (GT), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

¿Son los pueblos indígenas comunidades políticas legítimas? Una reflexión desde la filosofía política contemporánea frente a la propuesta de reforma constitucional de 2024 — Sandra Anchondo Pavón, Enrique Camacho Beltrán · Conocimiento y Acción (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS