Normal, abnormal, paranormal : philosophical determination of a ufological lexicon

This article aims to reflect on ufological questions based on the concept of “normality” and abnormality. Aiming to delineate the field of ufology, it seeks to distinguish what is abnormal from what is impossible, while questioning the criteria by which a phenomenon can be deemed “abnormal.” Introducing etymology of many terms and the notion of “perception,” the article shows that human perception has its own norms, which are therefore relative to it ; but these norms are not absolute in the sense that they can be violated, which invites us not to confuse the normative structure of human perception with impossibilities in themselves. Moreover, the reflection on perception is combined with the scientific norms conveyed by the “laws of Nature.” If the UAPs exhibit deviations from the laws of nature, it is necessary to characterize these deviations and determine whether they are “abnormal” or “anomic”; Leibniz’s conceptual framework is then invoked to clarify what a deviation from the laws of nature means, and what the possibility of such a deviation entails.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limina - The Journal of UAP Studies
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59661/001c.131851
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normal, abnormal, paranormal : philosophical determination of a ufological lexicon

Thibaut Gress
Limina - The Journal of UAP Studies
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Normal, abnormal, paranormal : philosophical determination of a ufological lexicon

Thibaut Gress
article en

Abstract

This article aims to reflect on ufological questions based on the concept of “normality” and abnormality. Aiming to delineate the field of ufology, it seeks to distinguish what is abnormal from what is impossible, while questioning the criteria by which a phenomenon can be deemed “abnormal.” Introducing etymology of many terms and the notion of “perception,” the article shows that human perception has its own norms, which are therefore relative to it ; but these norms are not absolute in the sense that they can be violated, which invites us not to confuse the normative structure of human perception with impossibilities in themselves. Moreover, the reflection on perception is combined with the scientific norms conveyed by the “laws of Nature.” If the UAPs exhibit deviations from the laws of nature, it is necessary to characterize these deviations and determine whether they are “abnormal” or “anomic”; Leibniz’s conceptual framework is then invoked to clarify what a deviation from the laws of nature means, and what the possibility of such a deviation entails.

Limina - The Journal of UAP StudiesVol. 2(1)
Institut catholique de paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Normal, abnormal, paranormal : philosophical determination of a ufological lexicon — Thibaut Gress · Limina - The Journal of UAP Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS