Artificial Intelligence Chatbot as a Companion for Cancer Patients About Most Common Questions: Analysis of Readability and Quality

Aim: Advances on artificial intelligence (AI) have led to development of AI chatbots and more people are using AI chatbots to seek answers to their questions every day. We conducted this study to investigate the readability and quality of answers generated by large language model AI chatbots as companions in answering questions for cancer patients. Methods: After surveying 508 patients admitted to the outpatient clinic of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, we selected the most frequently asked questions about the four most common cancer types and general cancer knowledge. We asked these questions of ChatGPT (an AI chatbot from OpenAI) and calculated readability and quality scores, and the statistical difference between suggested and calculated reading scores. Means and the t-tests (one-way and/or paired) were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 57 questions, including those about colorectal, breast, lung, prostate cancer, and general cancer questions, were selected for analysis. The mean Flesch Reading Ease Score for all questions was 48.18 [standard deviation (SD) ±11.65], which was significantly lower than the suggested reading score of 60 points (p<0.01). The mean score for graded readability scores was 13.21 (SD ±2.49), which was consistent with college-level readability and significantly higher than a suggested value of 6th graders (p<0.01). The mean DISCERN score of all questions was 51.98 (SD ±7.27) and the Global Quality Score was 3.91 (SD ±0.69). Breast cancer responses were easier to read on graded scales (p=0.02) and had higher quality (p=0.05). Conclusion: ChatGPT may be a good companion for cancer patients despite its limitations, but it should be used carefully.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta haematologica oncologica Turcica.
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/ahot.galenos.2024.2024-8-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Chatbot as a Companion for Cancer Patients About Most Common Questions: Analysis of Readability and Quality

Güngör Utkan, Elif Berna Köksoy, Efe Cem Erdat
1 citations
Acta haematologica oncologica Turcica.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Artificial Intelligence Chatbot as a Companion for Cancer Patients About Most Common Questions: Analysis of Readability and Quality

Güngör Utkan, Elif Berna Köksoy, Efe Cem Erdat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim: Advances on artificial intelligence (AI) have led to development of AI chatbots and more people are using AI chatbots to seek answers to their questions every day. We conducted this study to investigate the readability and quality of answers generated by large language model AI chatbots as companions in answering questions for cancer patients. Methods: After surveying 508 patients admitted to the outpatient clinic of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, we selected the most frequently asked questions about the four most common cancer types and general cancer knowledge. We asked these questions of ChatGPT (an AI chatbot from OpenAI) and calculated readability and quality scores, and the statistical difference between suggested and calculated reading scores. Means and the t-tests (one-way and/or paired) were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 57 questions, including those about colorectal, breast, lung, prostate cancer, and general cancer questions, were selected for analysis. The mean Flesch Reading Ease Score for all questions was 48.18 [standard deviation (SD) ±11.65], which was significantly lower than the suggested reading score of 60 points (p<0.01). The mean score for graded readability scores was 13.21 (SD ±2.49), which was consistent with college-level readability and significantly higher than a suggested value of 6th graders (p<0.01). The mean DISCERN score of all questions was 51.98 (SD ±7.27) and the Global Quality Score was 3.91 (SD ±0.69). Breast cancer responses were easier to read on graded scales (p=0.02) and had higher quality (p=0.05). Conclusion: ChatGPT may be a good companion for cancer patients despite its limitations, but it should be used carefully.

Acta haematologica oncologica Turcica.
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.