A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance

Acoustic telemetry is a tool for tracking animals, but transmitted signals from tagged animals are not always detected. Detection efficiency declines with increasing background noise, which can have both abiotic and biotic sources. The abiotic noise present in reef environments (waves, bubbles, etc.) is primarily low-frequency, but snapping shrimp create high-frequency noise that can interfere with transmission detections. Prior work in shallow coastal reefs correlated winds with less high-frequency background noise, and hypothesized that it was due to a balance of biotic and/or abiotic factors: shrimp may be less active during high wind events, and sound attenuation at the surface increases with wave height. To test this hypothesis, passive acoustic recordings from a live-bottom reef are used to quantify snapping shrimp snap rate. Snap rate was strongly correlated with temperature, and warmer environments appeared to be challenging for acoustic telemetry. However, the majority of synoptic variability in noise is shown to be driven by abiotic attenuation. Wind speed has little to no effect on snapping shrimp behavior, but has a significant inverse correlation with high-frequency noise levels due to surface attenuation of high-frequency noise, and therefore a positive effect on detection efficiency, pointing to primarily abiotic forcing behind noise variability and resulting telemetry success. This research gives context to previously collected detection data and can be leveraged to help plan future acoustic arrays in shallow, complex, and/or noisy environments, potentially predicting changes in detection range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030517
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance

Frank McQuarrie, Catherine Edwards, C. Brock Woodson
2 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Marine animal studies overview
3.43
article

A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance

Frank McQuarrie, Catherine Edwards, C. Brock Woodson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Acoustic telemetry is a tool for tracking animals, but transmitted signals from tagged animals are not always detected. Detection efficiency declines with increasing background noise, which can have both abiotic and biotic sources. The abiotic noise present in reef environments (waves, bubbles, etc.) is primarily low-frequency, but snapping shrimp create high-frequency noise that can interfere with transmission detections. Prior work in shallow coastal reefs correlated winds with less high-frequency background noise, and hypothesized that it was due to a balance of biotic and/or abiotic factors: shrimp may be less active during high wind events, and sound attenuation at the surface increases with wave height. To test this hypothesis, passive acoustic recordings from a live-bottom reef are used to quantify snapping shrimp snap rate. Snap rate was strongly correlated with temperature, and warmer environments appeared to be challenging for acoustic telemetry. However, the majority of synoptic variability in noise is shown to be driven by abiotic attenuation. Wind speed has little to no effect on snapping shrimp behavior, but has a significant inverse correlation with high-frequency noise levels due to surface attenuation of high-frequency noise, and therefore a positive effect on detection efficiency, pointing to primarily abiotic forcing behind noise variability and resulting telemetry success. This research gives context to previously collected detection data and can be leveraged to help plan future acoustic arrays in shallow, complex, and/or noisy environments, potentially predicting changes in detection range.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(3)
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography (US), University of Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Marine animal studies overview
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.