Think Before You Classify: The Rise of Reasoning Large Language Models for Consumer Complaint Detection and Classification

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, but their effectiveness in real-world consumer complaint classification without fine-tuning remains uncertain. Zero-shot classification offers a promising solution by enabling models to categorize consumer complaints without prior exposure to labeled training data, making it valuable for handling emerging issues and dynamic complaint categories in finance. However, this task is particularly challenging, as financial complaint categories often overlap, requiring a deep understanding of nuanced language. In this study, we evaluate the zero-shot classification performance of leading LLMs and reasoning models, totaling 14 models. Specifically, we assess DeepSeek-V3, Gemini-2.0-Flash, Gemini-1.5-Pro, Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 and 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 3.5 Haiku, and OpenAI’s GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-4o Mini, alongside reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1, o1, and o3. Unlike traditional LLMs, reasoning models are specifically trained with reinforcement learning to exhibit advanced inferential capabilities, structured decision-making, and complex reasoning, making their application to text classification a groundbreaking advancement. The models were tasked with classifying consumer complaints submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) into five predefined financial classes based solely on complaint text. Performance was measured using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and heatmaps to identify classification patterns. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of both standard LLMs and reasoning models in financial text processing, providing valuable insights into their practical applications. By integrating reasoning models into classification workflows, organizations may enhance complaint resolution automation and improve customer service efficiency, marking a significant step forward in AI-driven financial text analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14061070
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Think Before You Classify: The Rise of Reasoning Large Language Models for Consumer Complaint Detection and Classification

Nikolaos D. Tselikas, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Dimitrios Κ. Nasiopoulos
5 citations
Electronics
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
12.40
article

Think Before You Classify: The Rise of Reasoning Large Language Models for Consumer Complaint Detection and Classification

Nikolaos D. Tselikas, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Dimitrios Κ. Nasiopoulos
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, but their effectiveness in real-world consumer complaint classification without fine-tuning remains uncertain. Zero-shot classification offers a promising solution by enabling models to categorize consumer complaints without prior exposure to labeled training data, making it valuable for handling emerging issues and dynamic complaint categories in finance. However, this task is particularly challenging, as financial complaint categories often overlap, requiring a deep understanding of nuanced language. In this study, we evaluate the zero-shot classification performance of leading LLMs and reasoning models, totaling 14 models. Specifically, we assess DeepSeek-V3, Gemini-2.0-Flash, Gemini-1.5-Pro, Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 and 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 3.5 Haiku, and OpenAI’s GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and GPT-4o Mini, alongside reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1, o1, and o3. Unlike traditional LLMs, reasoning models are specifically trained with reinforcement learning to exhibit advanced inferential capabilities, structured decision-making, and complex reasoning, making their application to text classification a groundbreaking advancement. The models were tasked with classifying consumer complaints submitted to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) into five predefined financial classes based solely on complaint text. Performance was measured using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and heatmaps to identify classification patterns. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of both standard LLMs and reasoning models in financial text processing, providing valuable insights into their practical applications. By integrating reasoning models into classification workflows, organizations may enhance complaint resolution automation and improve customer service efficiency, marking a significant step forward in AI-driven financial text analysis.

ElectronicsVol. 14(6)
Agricultural University of Athens (GR), University of Peloponnese (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.