Pro‐environmental values foster support for both general and local ecological management

Ecological management (including restoration) of natural habitats is crucial for preserving biodiversity and maintaining ecosystem health. While its ecological significance is apparent, successful management also requires public support and thus has a social dimension. Here, we study (1) pro‐environmental values and attitudes toward (2) ecological management in general, and (3) specific restoration actions, clearing and burning junipers aimed at (4) conserving the nationally endangered Apollo butterfly ( Parnassius apollo ), conducted at the locality of the survey (the SW Finland archipelago). An electronic questionnaire designed to gauge these four listed attitudes was distributed among residents and visitors, yielding 230 responses, which were analyzed in a Structural Equation Model framework to reveal a positive correlation (0.57) between individuals' pro‐environmental values and their support for ecological management in general. However, the association between pro‐environmental values and specific restoration actions at the place of survey and concern about the management target (Apollo) was weaker (0.36 and 0.37, respectively) although positive. The results underscore the importance of fostering environmental values and enhancing community engagement in conservation efforts, as public support of ecological management does not seamlessly align with supporting actions at specific sites. We discuss our findings with respect to the NIMBY and sense of place concepts. This study highlights the critical need to address public concerns and promote transparency in ecological management to better align governmental policies with community sentiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70018
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pro‐environmental values foster support for both general and local ecological management

Jonna M. Kukkonen, Laura S. Tuominen, Jon E. Brommer
Restoration Ecology
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Pro‐environmental values foster support for both general and local ecological management

Jonna M. Kukkonen, Laura S. Tuominen, Jon E. Brommer
article en

Abstract

Ecological management (including restoration) of natural habitats is crucial for preserving biodiversity and maintaining ecosystem health. While its ecological significance is apparent, successful management also requires public support and thus has a social dimension. Here, we study (1) pro‐environmental values and attitudes toward (2) ecological management in general, and (3) specific restoration actions, clearing and burning junipers aimed at (4) conserving the nationally endangered Apollo butterfly ( Parnassius apollo ), conducted at the locality of the survey (the SW Finland archipelago). An electronic questionnaire designed to gauge these four listed attitudes was distributed among residents and visitors, yielding 230 responses, which were analyzed in a Structural Equation Model framework to reveal a positive correlation (0.57) between individuals' pro‐environmental values and their support for ecological management in general. However, the association between pro‐environmental values and specific restoration actions at the place of survey and concern about the management target (Apollo) was weaker (0.36 and 0.37, respectively) although positive. The results underscore the importance of fostering environmental values and enhancing community engagement in conservation efforts, as public support of ecological management does not seamlessly align with supporting actions at specific sites. We discuss our findings with respect to the NIMBY and sense of place concepts. This study highlights the critical need to address public concerns and promote transparency in ecological management to better align governmental policies with community sentiments.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(4)
University of Turku (FI)
Oskar Öflunds Stiftelse, Otto A. Malm Lahjoitusrahasto, Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, Suomen Luonnonsuojelun Säätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pro‐environmental values foster support for both general and local ecological management — Jonna M. Kukkonen, Laura S. Tuominen, et al. · Restoration Ecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS