Effectiveness Analysis of The I NEED HELP Scale For Prognostic Evaluation of Heart Transplant Waiting List Patients

Aim To evaluate the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in determining the six-month prognosis for patients on the heart transplant waiting list (HTWL) of the Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.Material and methods This retrospective study included 42 patients from the HTWL. The patients' survival for more than 6 months was assessed. The composite end point (CEP) of adverse outcome was all-cause death, heart transplantation (HT) due to the increased urgency of surgical intervention according to UNOS within 6 months after the inclusion in the HTWL. Patients were evaluated using the I NEED HELP scale. Statistical analysis was performed by nonparametric methods.Results The median I NEED HELP score was 4 [from 1 to 7]. The increase in score was positively correlated with the incidence of adverse outcomes (r=0.5; p=0.0007). The group of patients with an unfavorable outcome had a median score higher by one than for the survivors (score 5 vs. 4, respectively; p=0.001). The greatest effect on the prognosis was exerted by low systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=0.003); the failure to increase or the necessity to decrease the doses of disease-modifying drugs (p=0.039); and target organ dysfunction (p=0.039). The sensitivity and specificity of the scale at a score 5 or higher were 100% and 84%, respectively.Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in a patient population from a specialized center HTWL with high sensitivity and specificity at the determined threshold score 5 for an unfavorable outcome. It is appropriate to continue the study with an expanded sample and validation of the scale on patient cohorts from hospitals of various healthcare system levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kardiologiia
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2025.2.n2830
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness Analysis of The I NEED HELP Scale For Prognostic Evaluation of Heart Transplant Waiting List Patients

V. A. Znamensky, E. A. Lyasnikova, Mikhail Lisovsky, П. А. Федотов et al.
Kardiologiia
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Effectiveness Analysis of The I NEED HELP Scale For Prognostic Evaluation of Heart Transplant Waiting List Patients

V. A. Znamensky, E. A. Lyasnikova, Mikhail Lisovsky, П. А. Федотов, M. Yu. Sitnikova, K. V. Chelnyntsev
article en

Abstract

Aim To evaluate the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in determining the six-month prognosis for patients on the heart transplant waiting list (HTWL) of the Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.Material and methods This retrospective study included 42 patients from the HTWL. The patients' survival for more than 6 months was assessed. The composite end point (CEP) of adverse outcome was all-cause death, heart transplantation (HT) due to the increased urgency of surgical intervention according to UNOS within 6 months after the inclusion in the HTWL. Patients were evaluated using the I NEED HELP scale. Statistical analysis was performed by nonparametric methods.Results The median I NEED HELP score was 4 [from 1 to 7]. The increase in score was positively correlated with the incidence of adverse outcomes (r=0.5; p=0.0007). The group of patients with an unfavorable outcome had a median score higher by one than for the survivors (score 5 vs. 4, respectively; p=0.001). The greatest effect on the prognosis was exerted by low systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=0.003); the failure to increase or the necessity to decrease the doses of disease-modifying drugs (p=0.039); and target organ dysfunction (p=0.039). The sensitivity and specificity of the scale at a score 5 or higher were 100% and 84%, respectively.Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated the efficacy of the I NEED HELP scale in a patient population from a specialized center HTWL with high sensitivity and specificity at the determined threshold score 5 for an unfavorable outcome. It is appropriate to continue the study with an expanded sample and validation of the scale on patient cohorts from hospitals of various healthcare system levels.

KardiologiiaVol. 65(2)
Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.