“I haven’t seen any results yet”: on ethical collaborative research in linguistics and the need for a standard protocol

Abstract What does ‘good’ ethical conduct in linguistics look like from the perspective of the communities with whom we work? We address this question by drawing on observations from a community-bridging and knowledge exchange exercise involving both researchers and members of researched communities. Based on the experiences of those co-authors on the research team working with and for two associations representing Latin Americans and Chagossians in the United Kingdom, we discuss power asymmetries in collaboration, academic gatekeeping, and issues surrounding knowledge production, with specific reference to the design and implementation of funded research projects in formal linguistics. The paper’s originality lies in the practical recommendations made to the formal linguistics community on the basis of our synthesis of the testimony offered, so as to promote equitable and ethical research conduct. These include a prioritising of principles drawn from community-based and participatory research frameworks, the co-design of a long-term action plan, and a reconsideration of resource allocation to incorporate opportunities for professional development and infrastructure building. Our contention is that striving for a research design that is beneficial to the community on their terms should be the guiding star of project planning inasmuch as it is both ethically compelling and achievable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2025-0016
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I haven’t seen any results yet”: on ethical collaborative research in linguistics and the need for a standard protocol

Norma Schifano, Jonathan Kasstan, Patrick Allen, Pascalina Nellan et al.
2 citations
Linguistics
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
20.85
article

“I haven’t seen any results yet”: on ethical collaborative research in linguistics and the need for a standard protocol

Norma Schifano, Jonathan Kasstan, Patrick Allen, Pascalina Nellan, Tomás Restrepo Garcés
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract What does ‘good’ ethical conduct in linguistics look like from the perspective of the communities with whom we work? We address this question by drawing on observations from a community-bridging and knowledge exchange exercise involving both researchers and members of researched communities. Based on the experiences of those co-authors on the research team working with and for two associations representing Latin Americans and Chagossians in the United Kingdom, we discuss power asymmetries in collaboration, academic gatekeeping, and issues surrounding knowledge production, with specific reference to the design and implementation of funded research projects in formal linguistics. The paper’s originality lies in the practical recommendations made to the formal linguistics community on the basis of our synthesis of the testimony offered, so as to promote equitable and ethical research conduct. These include a prioritising of principles drawn from community-based and participatory research frameworks, the co-design of a long-term action plan, and a reconsideration of resource allocation to incorporate opportunities for professional development and infrastructure building. Our contention is that striving for a research design that is beneficial to the community on their terms should be the guiding star of project planning inasmuch as it is both ethically compelling and achievable.

LinguisticsVol. 63(2)
University of Leicester (GB), Crawley Hospital (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Westminster (GB)
Nottingham Trent University, Trent University, Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
20.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.