Dark matter stabilized by a non-Abelian group: Lessons from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>36</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="f

When building dark matter (DM) models, one often imposes conserved discrete symmetries to stabilize DM candidates. The simplest choice is <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</a:mi><a:mn>2</a:mn></a:msub></a:math> but models with larger stabilizing groups have also been explored. Can a conserved non-Abelian group lead to a viable DM model? Here, we address this question within the three-Higgs-doublet model based on the group <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</d:mi><d:mo stretchy="false">(</d:mo><d:mn>36</d:mn><d:mo stretchy="false">)</d:mo></d:math>, in which DM stabilization by a non-Abelian group is not only possible but inevitable. We show that the tight connections between the Higgs, fermion, and DM sectors repeatedly drive the model into conflict with the LHC results and DM observations, with the most recent LZ results playing a decisive role. We believe that the lessons learned from this study help chart the limits of what can be achieved within multi-Higgs-doublet DM models with large symmetry groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.055006
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dark matter stabilized by a non-Abelian group: Lessons from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>36</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="f

Rafael Boto, Igor Ivanov, João P. Silva, Hong Deng
3 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
3.46
article

Dark matter stabilized by a non-Abelian group: Lessons from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>36</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="f

Rafael Boto, Igor Ivanov, João P. Silva, Hong Deng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

When building dark matter (DM) models, one often imposes conserved discrete symmetries to stabilize DM candidates. The simplest choice is <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</a:mi><a:mn>2</a:mn></a:msub></a:math> but models with larger stabilizing groups have also been explored. Can a conserved non-Abelian group lead to a viable DM model? Here, we address this question within the three-Higgs-doublet model based on the group <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><d:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</d:mi><d:mo stretchy="false">(</d:mo><d:mn>36</d:mn><d:mo stretchy="false">)</d:mo></d:math>, in which DM stabilization by a non-Abelian group is not only possible but inevitable. We show that the tight connections between the Higgs, fermion, and DM sectors repeatedly drive the model into conflict with the LHC results and DM observations, with the most recent LZ results playing a decisive role. We believe that the lessons learned from this study help chart the limits of what can be achieved within multi-Higgs-doublet DM models with large symmetry groups.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(5)
University of Lisbon (PT), Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
European Commission, Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.