Machine Learning Models for Creep Rupture Prediction of Inconel 617

Abstract Creep rupture data are not always available at the desired temperature or stress levels, and performing creep tests can be both time-consuming and expensive. Creep rupture data from various sources are often combined for modeling. However, such combined data may overlap or exhibit a wide scatter band because of different metadata factors. A small change in chemical composition may affect the creep properties, creating a large variation in the rupture data. Machine learning (ML) offers a way to model these variations by including metadata such as chemical compositions. This study applies a python-based machine learning approach to predict the creep rupture in the form of Larson–Miller parameters (LMPs) of Inconel 617. Data from eight different sources (General Electric Company (GE), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), German High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor (HTGR), Huntington Alloy, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Argonne National Lab (ANL), Atomic Energy Commission, and advanced ultrasupercritical (A-USC) boiler material data) which encompass multiple heats are used. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) are employed to rank the input features based on their correlation with the Larson–Miller parameter, followed by an assessment of feature selection. Seven different regression methods (random forest (RF) regression, linear regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector regression (SVR), gradient boosting (GB) regression, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)) are used for model training. The data are randomly split into training and testing datasets where the resulting prediction model is validated against testing data that is not used in calibration. Fivefold cross-validation and model learning curves are analyzed to rank model performances. A two-stage hyperparameter tuning is performed on suitable models for improved accuracy and stability and to minimize overfitting risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Models for Creep Rupture Prediction of Inconel 617

Mohammad Shafinul Haque, Zakia Al Kadri
1 citations
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
1.15
article

Machine Learning Models for Creep Rupture Prediction of Inconel 617

Mohammad Shafinul Haque, Zakia Al Kadri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Creep rupture data are not always available at the desired temperature or stress levels, and performing creep tests can be both time-consuming and expensive. Creep rupture data from various sources are often combined for modeling. However, such combined data may overlap or exhibit a wide scatter band because of different metadata factors. A small change in chemical composition may affect the creep properties, creating a large variation in the rupture data. Machine learning (ML) offers a way to model these variations by including metadata such as chemical compositions. This study applies a python-based machine learning approach to predict the creep rupture in the form of Larson–Miller parameters (LMPs) of Inconel 617. Data from eight different sources (General Electric Company (GE), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), German High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor (HTGR), Huntington Alloy, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Argonne National Lab (ANL), Atomic Energy Commission, and advanced ultrasupercritical (A-USC) boiler material data) which encompass multiple heats are used. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) are employed to rank the input features based on their correlation with the Larson–Miller parameter, followed by an assessment of feature selection. Seven different regression methods (random forest (RF) regression, linear regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector regression (SVR), gradient boosting (GB) regression, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)) are used for model training. The data are randomly split into training and testing datasets where the resulting prediction model is validated against testing data that is not used in calibration. Fivefold cross-validation and model learning curves are analyzed to rank model performances. A two-stage hyperparameter tuning is performed on suitable models for improved accuracy and stability and to minimize overfitting risk.

Journal of Pressure Vessel TechnologyVol. 147(4)
Angelo State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.