The Condition Evaluation of Bridges Based on Fuzzy BWM and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

Accurate and objective evaluation of existing bridges is critical for ensuring the bridge’s safety and optimizing maintenance strategies. This study proposes an integrated Fuzzy Best and Worst Method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FBWM-FCE) model to evaluate uncertainties in expert judgments and complex decision-making. A four-layer evaluation indicator system and five distinct grades for bridges were established, aligned with the JTG 5120-2004 and JTG/T H21-2011 standards. The FBWM innovatively employs triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) to reduce linguistic uncertainties and cognitive bias in bridge evaluation. Subsequently, by integrating FCE for multi-level fuzzy comprehensive operations, the method translates qualitative evaluations into quantitative evaluations using membership matrices and weights. A case study of Ding Jia Bridge and Jigongling Bridge validated the FBWM-FCE model, revealing Class III Bridge (fail condition), consistent with on-site inspections in the 2020 Bridge Inspection and Evaluation Report (Highway Administration of Hubei Provincial Department of Transportation). Comparative analysis demonstrated FBWM’s operational efficiency, requiring 20% fewer pairwise comparisons than AHP while maintaining higher consistency than BWM. The model’s reliability stems from its systematic handling of epistemic uncertainties, offering a high reduction in procedural complexity compared to standardized methods. These advancements provide a scientifically rigorous yet practical tool for bridge management, balancing computational efficiency with evaluation accuracy to support maintenance decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062904
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Condition Evaluation of Bridges Based on Fuzzy BWM and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

Yunyu Li, Longfan Peng, Yabin Liang, Hao Liu et al.
6 citations
Applied Sciences
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
11.03
article

The Condition Evaluation of Bridges Based on Fuzzy BWM and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

Yunyu Li, Longfan Peng, Yabin Liang, Hao Liu, Yongsheng Wang, Jingwen Deng, Feng Qian, Hepeng Zhang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Accurate and objective evaluation of existing bridges is critical for ensuring the bridge’s safety and optimizing maintenance strategies. This study proposes an integrated Fuzzy Best and Worst Method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FBWM-FCE) model to evaluate uncertainties in expert judgments and complex decision-making. A four-layer evaluation indicator system and five distinct grades for bridges were established, aligned with the JTG 5120-2004 and JTG/T H21-2011 standards. The FBWM innovatively employs triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) to reduce linguistic uncertainties and cognitive bias in bridge evaluation. Subsequently, by integrating FCE for multi-level fuzzy comprehensive operations, the method translates qualitative evaluations into quantitative evaluations using membership matrices and weights. A case study of Ding Jia Bridge and Jigongling Bridge validated the FBWM-FCE model, revealing Class III Bridge (fail condition), consistent with on-site inspections in the 2020 Bridge Inspection and Evaluation Report (Highway Administration of Hubei Provincial Department of Transportation). Comparative analysis demonstrated FBWM’s operational efficiency, requiring 20% fewer pairwise comparisons than AHP while maintaining higher consistency than BWM. The model’s reliability stems from its systematic handling of epistemic uncertainties, offering a high reduction in procedural complexity compared to standardized methods. These advancements provide a scientifically rigorous yet practical tool for bridge management, balancing computational efficiency with evaluation accuracy to support maintenance decisions.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(6)
Wuhan University of Technology (CN), China State Construction Engineering (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
11.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.