Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution

Abstract Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can mitigate alkali-silica reaction by lowering the alkali metal concentration in the pore solution. This is a theoretical study on the applicability of a thermodynamic model (GEMS) and the empirical Taylor model to predict the required replacement level of portland cement (PC) by SCMs to achieve an alkali metal concentration below 300 mmol/L. The SCMs investigated are silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), fly ash (FA) and slag. The impact of the alkali content of the PC and the w/b ratio on the required replacement level is modelled and compared to experimental pore solution concentrations. Both models predict a similar impact of the SCM replacement level on the distribution of alkali between the pore solution, C–S–H and unreacted material. The thermodynamic model predicts little impact of the alkali content of PC and the w/b-ratio on the required replacement level, i.e., 20% SF, 20% MK, 40–50% FA and 60–70% slag. This is contrary to the Taylor model, which predicts that the replacement levels of FA and slag ranges from 7 to 58% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93% and from 80 to 10%, when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The required replacement levels for SF and MK vary between 2 and 19% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93%, and from 40 to < 5% when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The main difference between the two models is how they account for the uptake of alkali metals by the C–S–H.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials and Structures
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution

Miriam E. Krüger, Petter Hemstad, Maxime Ranger, Barbara Lothenbach et al.
8 citations
Materials and Structures
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
7.63
article

Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution

Miriam E. Krüger, Petter Hemstad, Maxime Ranger, Barbara Lothenbach, Ana Bergmann, Andreas Leemann, Klaartje De Weerdt
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can mitigate alkali-silica reaction by lowering the alkali metal concentration in the pore solution. This is a theoretical study on the applicability of a thermodynamic model (GEMS) and the empirical Taylor model to predict the required replacement level of portland cement (PC) by SCMs to achieve an alkali metal concentration below 300 mmol/L. The SCMs investigated are silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), fly ash (FA) and slag. The impact of the alkali content of the PC and the w/b ratio on the required replacement level is modelled and compared to experimental pore solution concentrations. Both models predict a similar impact of the SCM replacement level on the distribution of alkali between the pore solution, C–S–H and unreacted material. The thermodynamic model predicts little impact of the alkali content of PC and the w/b-ratio on the required replacement level, i.e., 20% SF, 20% MK, 40–50% FA and 60–70% slag. This is contrary to the Taylor model, which predicts that the replacement levels of FA and slag ranges from 7 to 58% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93% and from 80 to 10%, when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The required replacement levels for SF and MK vary between 2 and 19% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93%, and from 40 to < 5% when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The main difference between the two models is how they account for the uptake of alkali metals by the C–S–H.

Materials and StructuresVol. 58(3)
University of Ulster (GB), University of Ottawa (CA), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), HeidelbergCement (Norway) (NO), Université Laval (CA), Technical University of Munich (DE), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH), Ottawa University (US), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität München
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
7.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.