Coercing finance to fund decarbonization: the democratic case for coercion in funding the green transformation

Insofar as governments want to secure a democratic green transition, attention must be paid not only to which policy approach will be effective, quick, or cheap but also to which policy approach preserves the power of citizens to coerce private agents through public policy. I defend this claim using the work of Scott Anderson on coercion. While much democratic theory focuses on the necessary limits to a state’s coercive powers, I suggest we must also consider the need to preserve those powers over time. I argue that the state has good reason to engage in coercing private finance to fund the green transition. If it doesn’t, a pattern of nudging or attracting investment will bolster private financial agents’ power and in so doing, undermine the state’s coercive power that is foundational to a healthy democracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Political Economy
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2471854
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coercing finance to fund decarbonization: the democratic case for coercion in funding the green transformation

Leah Downey
8 citations
Review of International Political Economy
Economic Theory and Policy
24.68
article

Coercing finance to fund decarbonization: the democratic case for coercion in funding the green transformation

Leah Downey
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Insofar as governments want to secure a democratic green transition, attention must be paid not only to which policy approach will be effective, quick, or cheap but also to which policy approach preserves the power of citizens to coerce private agents through public policy. I defend this claim using the work of Scott Anderson on coercion. While much democratic theory focuses on the necessary limits to a state’s coercive powers, I suggest we must also consider the need to preserve those powers over time. I argue that the state has good reason to engage in coercing private finance to fund the green transition. If it doesn’t, a pattern of nudging or attracting investment will bolster private financial agents’ power and in so doing, undermine the state’s coercive power that is foundational to a healthy democracy.

Review of International Political EconomyVol. 32(3)
St. John's College of Nursing (US), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Economic Theory and Policy
24.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coercing finance to fund decarbonization: the democratic case for coercion in funding the green transformation — Leah Downey · Review of International Political Economy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS