Social networks and loneliness differ between LGBTIA and cis-heterosexual persons: results from a two-wave survey in Germany

Current research suggests LGBTIA persons to be lonelier than cis-heterosexual persons. While they rely more on friends than on family as support network, their social network and weekly contact to family and friends, as well as the association between the social network and loneliness have not been fully explored yet. The aim of this analysis was to examine differences in the social network between LGBTIA and cis-heterosexual persons in Germany, and how these differences affect loneliness. Data was collected through an online survey conducted in two independent waves in March/April 2020 and in January/February 2021. Linear regression analyses were performed to examine the influence of the social network on loneliness. Of 6784 participants, 5442 identified as LGBTIA. Weekly contact to family was lower in the LGBTIA group than in cis-heterosexuals. LGBTIA were less likely to be in a relationship. Identifying as LGBTIA increased social and emotional loneliness. Differences in social network partly explained the risk for social loneliness of LGBTIA persons and, to a lower degree, the risk for emotional loneliness. We encourage health care professionals to inquire about sexual orientation, gender identity, and relationship status to raise awareness for feelings of loneliness and related health problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92021-9
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social networks and loneliness differ between LGBTIA and cis-heterosexual persons: results from a two-wave survey in Germany

Hendrik Napierala, Philip Oeser, Marie Bolster, Wolfram Herrmann et al.
1 links
Scientific Reports
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Social networks and loneliness differ between LGBTIA and cis-heterosexual persons: results from a two-wave survey in Germany

Hendrik Napierala, Philip Oeser, Marie Bolster, Wolfram Herrmann, Paul R. Gellert, Tristan Wellendorff
article en

Abstract

Current research suggests LGBTIA persons to be lonelier than cis-heterosexual persons. While they rely more on friends than on family as support network, their social network and weekly contact to family and friends, as well as the association between the social network and loneliness have not been fully explored yet. The aim of this analysis was to examine differences in the social network between LGBTIA and cis-heterosexual persons in Germany, and how these differences affect loneliness. Data was collected through an online survey conducted in two independent waves in March/April 2020 and in January/February 2021. Linear regression analyses were performed to examine the influence of the social network on loneliness. Of 6784 participants, 5442 identified as LGBTIA. Weekly contact to family was lower in the LGBTIA group than in cis-heterosexuals. LGBTIA were less likely to be in a relationship. Identifying as LGBTIA increased social and emotional loneliness. Differences in social network partly explained the risk for social loneliness of LGBTIA persons and, to a lower degree, the risk for emotional loneliness. We encourage health care professionals to inquire about sexual orientation, gender identity, and relationship status to raise awareness for feelings of loneliness and related health problems.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social networks and loneliness differ between LGBTIA and cis-heterosexual persons: results from a two-wave survey in Germany — Hendrik Napierala, Philip Oeser, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS