Gender Comes First: Experimental Evidence for the Representation of Gender Closer to the Noun Stem Than Number across Linguistic Populations

Morphosyntactic expression exhibits significant crosslinguistic variation, yet systematic tendencies emerge. Gender and number features are frequently coexpressed within a single exponent, and when they are realized separately, gender morphology tends to surface closer to the stem. Competing theoretical accounts of gender and number seek to explain these tendencies, but empirical validation remains challenging due to sparse typological data. Across a series of artificial language learning experiments, we demonstrate that learners exhibit a robust preference for placing nominal morphology encoding gender information closest to the stem. This bias, consistent across English, Italian, and Kîîtharaka speakers, holds for both prefixing and suffixing morphology, and across different types of gender and number systems. These results provide a new source of empirical support for theories proposing a gender-first derivation and highlight cognitive constraints influencing morpheme order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Inquiry
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00552
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Comes First: Experimental Evidence for the Representation of Gender Closer to the Noun Stem Than Number across Linguistic Populations

Patrick Kanampiu, Carmen Saldana, Jennifer Culbertson
1 links
Linguistic Inquiry
Gender Studies in Language
article

Gender Comes First: Experimental Evidence for the Representation of Gender Closer to the Noun Stem Than Number across Linguistic Populations

Patrick Kanampiu, Carmen Saldana, Jennifer Culbertson
article en

Abstract

Morphosyntactic expression exhibits significant crosslinguistic variation, yet systematic tendencies emerge. Gender and number features are frequently coexpressed within a single exponent, and when they are realized separately, gender morphology tends to surface closer to the stem. Competing theoretical accounts of gender and number seek to explain these tendencies, but empirical validation remains challenging due to sparse typological data. Across a series of artificial language learning experiments, we demonstrate that learners exhibit a robust preference for placing nominal morphology encoding gender information closest to the stem. This bias, consistent across English, Italian, and Kîîtharaka speakers, holds for both prefixing and suffixing morphology, and across different types of gender and number systems. These results provide a new source of empirical support for theories proposing a gender-first derivation and highlight cognitive constraints influencing morpheme order.

Linguistic Inquiry
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Zurich (CH), Chuka University (KE), Language Science (South Korea) (KR), Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution (GB), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender Comes First: Experimental Evidence for the Representation of Gender Closer to the Noun Stem Than Number across Linguistic Populations — Patrick Kanampiu, Carmen Saldana, et al. · Linguistic Inquiry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS