Core dimensions of human material perception

Visually categorizing and comparing materials is crucial for everyday behavior, but what organizational principles underlie our mental representation of materials? Here, we used a large-scale data-driven approach to uncover core latent dimensions of material representations from behavior. First, we created an image dataset of 200 systematically sampled materials and 600 photographs (STUFF dataset, https://osf.io/myutc/). Using these images, we next collected 1.87 million triplet similarity judgments and used a computational model to derive a set of sparse, positive dimensions underlying these judgments. The resulting multidimensional embedding space predicted independent material similarity judgments and the similarity matrix of all images close to the human intersubject consistency. We found that representations of individual images were captured by a combination of 36 material dimensions that were highly reproducible and interpretable, comprising perceptual (e.g., grainy, blue) as well as conceptual (e.g., mineral, viscous) dimensions. These results provide the foundation for a comprehensive understanding of how humans make sense of materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2417202122
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Core dimensions of human material perception

Filipp Schmidt, Martin N. Hebart, Roland W. Fleming, Alexandra C. Schmid
11 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Face Recognition and Perception
15.74
article

Core dimensions of human material perception

Filipp Schmidt, Martin N. Hebart, Roland W. Fleming, Alexandra C. Schmid
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Visually categorizing and comparing materials is crucial for everyday behavior, but what organizational principles underlie our mental representation of materials? Here, we used a large-scale data-driven approach to uncover core latent dimensions of material representations from behavior. First, we created an image dataset of 200 systematically sampled materials and 600 photographs (STUFF dataset, https://osf.io/myutc/). Using these images, we next collected 1.87 million triplet similarity judgments and used a computational model to derive a set of sparse, positive dimensions underlying these judgments. The resulting multidimensional embedding space predicted independent material similarity judgments and the similarity matrix of all images close to the human intersubject consistency. We found that representations of individual images were captured by a combination of 36 material dimensions that were highly reproducible and interpretable, comprising perceptual (e.g., grainy, blue) as well as conceptual (e.g., mineral, viscous) dimensions. These results provide the foundation for a comprehensive understanding of how humans make sense of materials.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(10)
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Max Planck School of Cognition, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Face Recognition and Perception
15.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Core dimensions of human material perception — Filipp Schmidt, Martin N. Hebart, et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS