An activity transition in FRB 20201124A: Methodological rigor, detection of frequency-dependent cessation, and a geometric magnetar model

We report detections of fast radio bursts (FRBs) from the repeating source FRB 20201124A with Apertif/WSRT and GMRT, and measurements of basic burst properties, especially the dispersion measure (DM) and fluence. Based on comparisons of these properties with previously published larger samples, we argue that the excess DM reported earlier for pulses with integrated signal-to-noise ratios ≲1000 is due to incompletely accounting for what is known as the sad trombone effect, even when using structure-maximizing DM algorithms. Our investigations of fluence distributions next lead us to advise against formal power-law fitting; we especially caution against the use of the least-squares method, and we demonstrate the large biases involved. A maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) provides a much more accurate estimate of the power law, and we provide accessible code for direct inclusion in future research. Our GMRT observations were fortuitously scheduled around the end of the Spring 2021 activity window as recorded by FAST. We detected several bursts (one of them very strong) at 400/600 MHz, a few hours after sensitive FAST non-detections already showed the 1.3 GHz FRB emission to have ceased. After FRB 20180916B, this is a second example of a frequency-dependent activity window identified in a repeating FRB source. Since numerous efforts have so far failed to determine a spin period for FRB 20201124A, we conjecture that it is an ultra-long-period magnetar, with a period on the scale of months, and with a very wide, highly irregular duty cycle. Assuming the emission comes from closed field lines, we used radius-to-frequency mapping and polarization information from other studies to constrain the magnetospheric geometry and location of the emission region. Our initial findings are consistent with a possible connection between FRBs and crustal motion events.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451413
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An activity transition in FRB 20201124A: Methodological rigor, detection of frequency-dependent cessation, and a geometric magnetar model

J. van Leeuwen, I. Pastor-Marazuela, A. V. Bilous, L. C. Oostrum et al.
2 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
article

An activity transition in FRB 20201124A: Methodological rigor, detection of frequency-dependent cessation, and a geometric magnetar model

J. van Leeuwen, I. Pastor-Marazuela, A. V. Bilous, L. C. Oostrum, Kaustubh M. Rajwade, Yogesh Maan, Yun Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We report detections of fast radio bursts (FRBs) from the repeating source FRB 20201124A with Apertif/WSRT and GMRT, and measurements of basic burst properties, especially the dispersion measure (DM) and fluence. Based on comparisons of these properties with previously published larger samples, we argue that the excess DM reported earlier for pulses with integrated signal-to-noise ratios ≲1000 is due to incompletely accounting for what is known as the sad trombone effect, even when using structure-maximizing DM algorithms. Our investigations of fluence distributions next lead us to advise against formal power-law fitting; we especially caution against the use of the least-squares method, and we demonstrate the large biases involved. A maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) provides a much more accurate estimate of the power law, and we provide accessible code for direct inclusion in future research. Our GMRT observations were fortuitously scheduled around the end of the Spring 2021 activity window as recorded by FAST. We detected several bursts (one of them very strong) at 400/600 MHz, a few hours after sensitive FAST non-detections already showed the 1.3 GHz FRB emission to have ceased. After FRB 20180916B, this is a second example of a frequency-dependent activity window identified in a repeating FRB source. Since numerous efforts have so far failed to determine a spin period for FRB 20201124A, we conjecture that it is an ultra-long-period magnetar, with a period on the scale of months, and with a very wide, highly irregular duty cycle. Assuming the emission comes from closed field lines, we used radius-to-frequency mapping and polarization information from other studies to constrain the magnetospheric geometry and location of the emission region. Our initial findings are consistent with a possible connection between FRBs and crustal motion events.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 696
European Commission, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, ASTRON, European Research Council, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.