Spatial vitality variation in community parks and their influencing factors

Community parks are the primary locations for urban residents to engage in nature, exercise, and establish social contact. This study used System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) to conduct field surveys of three typical community parks in Hangzhou, focusing on analyzing the differences in subspace vitality within community parks. First, we classified park spaces into four types: courts, lawns, fitness grounds, and pavilions. We selected 11 variables to assess the landscape features of the subspaces; then, visitor density, activity richness, activity evenness, and time stability were selected to quantify the vitality characteristics of the four space types. Finally, a mixed linear model was used to explore the relationship between landscape features and different types of spatial vitality and to select the key influencing factors affecting spatial vitality. The study found that (1) the vitality of different types of spaces in community parks differed significantly, showing three types of vitality. Among them, high activity richness and evenness, low visitor density and time stability were observed in courts and lawns. However, fitness grounds showed the opposite vitality pattern. Pavilions exhibited exceptionally high visitor density but low activity richness, activity evenness, and time stability. (2) The key influences affecting subspace vitality mainly include hydrophilicity and accessibility and exhibit enhancing or inhibiting effects on different types of spaces. The study found water-friendliness positively contributed to visitor density, activity richness, and time stability in all types of subspaces. Sports facilities increased visitor density and time stability on courts, lawns, and fitness grounds but reduced their activity evenness. Accessibility had an enhancing effect on activity richness but an inhibiting effect on the activity evenness of pavilions. We suggest that community parks be made more vibrant by adding natural elements to the space, installing multifunctional and compact facilities, and subdividing spatial functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312941
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial vitality variation in community parks and their influencing factors

Juan Wang, Xiao Hu, Jingjing Zhang
7 citations
PLoS ONE
Urban Green Space and Health
8.40
article

Spatial vitality variation in community parks and their influencing factors

Juan Wang, Xiao Hu, Jingjing Zhang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Community parks are the primary locations for urban residents to engage in nature, exercise, and establish social contact. This study used System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) to conduct field surveys of three typical community parks in Hangzhou, focusing on analyzing the differences in subspace vitality within community parks. First, we classified park spaces into four types: courts, lawns, fitness grounds, and pavilions. We selected 11 variables to assess the landscape features of the subspaces; then, visitor density, activity richness, activity evenness, and time stability were selected to quantify the vitality characteristics of the four space types. Finally, a mixed linear model was used to explore the relationship between landscape features and different types of spatial vitality and to select the key influencing factors affecting spatial vitality. The study found that (1) the vitality of different types of spaces in community parks differed significantly, showing three types of vitality. Among them, high activity richness and evenness, low visitor density and time stability were observed in courts and lawns. However, fitness grounds showed the opposite vitality pattern. Pavilions exhibited exceptionally high visitor density but low activity richness, activity evenness, and time stability. (2) The key influences affecting subspace vitality mainly include hydrophilicity and accessibility and exhibit enhancing or inhibiting effects on different types of spaces. The study found water-friendliness positively contributed to visitor density, activity richness, and time stability in all types of subspaces. Sports facilities increased visitor density and time stability on courts, lawns, and fitness grounds but reduced their activity evenness. Accessibility had an enhancing effect on activity richness but an inhibiting effect on the activity evenness of pavilions. We suggest that community parks be made more vibrant by adding natural elements to the space, installing multifunctional and compact facilities, and subdividing spatial functions.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(3)
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN), Zhejiang Shuren University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urban Green Space and Health
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.