Kant's and Schiller's different understandings of the human person

Abstract Freedom is an eternal theme of thought in modern Europe. In philosophers, freedom is embodied in the freedom of reason, and in poets, freedom is embodied in the freedom of human nature. Unlike the philosopher Kant, who defined a person as the subject of practical reason and took the realisation of the supreme good—that is, the freedom of the moral person—as the goal of his thought, the poet Schiller understands the person as a “beautiful personality” harmonising sensibility and rationality, and the fulfilment of human nature as the ultimate goal of his thought. Here, the motive of Schiller's thought is embodied in an ideal, which is manifested in the pursuit of human nature to reach infinity—that is, sanctity. At the same time, in ideal art, what emerges from the unity of body and spirit, sensibility and reason, is the personality as an idea in itself, with its own stipulation of beauty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metaphilosophy
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12725
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kant's and Schiller's different understandings of the human person

Xiaoyun Si
Metaphilosophy
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Kant's and Schiller's different understandings of the human person

Xiaoyun Si
article en

Abstract

Abstract Freedom is an eternal theme of thought in modern Europe. In philosophers, freedom is embodied in the freedom of reason, and in poets, freedom is embodied in the freedom of human nature. Unlike the philosopher Kant, who defined a person as the subject of practical reason and took the realisation of the supreme good—that is, the freedom of the moral person—as the goal of his thought, the poet Schiller understands the person as a “beautiful personality” harmonising sensibility and rationality, and the fulfilment of human nature as the ultimate goal of his thought. Here, the motive of Schiller's thought is embodied in an ideal, which is manifested in the pursuit of human nature to reach infinity—that is, sanctity. At the same time, in ideal art, what emerges from the unity of body and spirit, sensibility and reason, is the personality as an idea in itself, with its own stipulation of beauty.

MetaphilosophyVol. 56(2)
Xi'an International Studies University (CN), Xi’an International University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kant's and Schiller's different understandings of the human person — Xiaoyun Si · Metaphilosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS