Exploring Paradox: Moderating and Mediating Mechanisms in the Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employees' Helping Behavior (Case Study: Public Hospitals in Yazd City)

Background: Typically, researchers believe that abusive supervision decreases employees' helping behavior. However, according to the emotional process theory of abusive supervision, subordinates show more helping behavior under certain conditions. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of abusive supervision on employees' helping behavior, with a focus on the mediating role of self-blame and guilt as well as the moderating effects of core self-evaluation (CSE) and power distance. Methods: The present study is applied in purpose and descriptive in method, classified as a semi-experimental study regarding its design. The statistical population comprised all administrative and medical staff working in public hospitals of Yazd. Sampling was conducted using a convenience sampling method, with the sample size determined through G-Power software. After removing outliers, 381 participants remained for analysis. Data were collected via a questionnaire, and after confirming its reliability and validity, hypotheses were tested using SPSS21 software and the PROCESS module. Results: The direct association between abusive supervision and employees’ helping behavior was significantly negative (-0/235). The mediation by self-blame and guilt was negative too. The relationship between abusive supervision and self-blame was positively correlated to CSE (0/224), while the association between self-blame and guilt was negatively correlated to power distance. Conclusion: In the context of abusive supervision and its aftermath, this study introduced self-blame and guilt as two mediators that can affect subordinates’ reactions to abusive supervision. Also, for the first time, CSE was tested as a moderator between abusive supervision and self-blame. Finally, in response to previous calls for research, the moderating role of subordinates’ power distance orientation in the relationship between self-blame and guilt was investigated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Evidence Based Health Policy Management and Economics
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/jebhpme.v8i3.18079
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Paradox: Moderating and Mediating Mechanisms in the Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employees' Helping Behavior (Case Study: Public Hospitals in Yazd City)

Nahid Amrollahi biuki, Mahammad Sadegh Sharifirad, Roghye Hekmat Nasab
Evidence Based Health Policy Management and Economics
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Exploring Paradox: Moderating and Mediating Mechanisms in the Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employees' Helping Behavior (Case Study: Public Hospitals in Yazd City)

Nahid Amrollahi biuki, Mahammad Sadegh Sharifirad, Roghye Hekmat Nasab
article en

Abstract

Background: Typically, researchers believe that abusive supervision decreases employees' helping behavior. However, according to the emotional process theory of abusive supervision, subordinates show more helping behavior under certain conditions. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of abusive supervision on employees' helping behavior, with a focus on the mediating role of self-blame and guilt as well as the moderating effects of core self-evaluation (CSE) and power distance. Methods: The present study is applied in purpose and descriptive in method, classified as a semi-experimental study regarding its design. The statistical population comprised all administrative and medical staff working in public hospitals of Yazd. Sampling was conducted using a convenience sampling method, with the sample size determined through G-Power software. After removing outliers, 381 participants remained for analysis. Data were collected via a questionnaire, and after confirming its reliability and validity, hypotheses were tested using SPSS21 software and the PROCESS module. Results: The direct association between abusive supervision and employees’ helping behavior was significantly negative (-0/235). The mediation by self-blame and guilt was negative too. The relationship between abusive supervision and self-blame was positively correlated to CSE (0/224), while the association between self-blame and guilt was negatively correlated to power distance. Conclusion: In the context of abusive supervision and its aftermath, this study introduced self-blame and guilt as two mediators that can affect subordinates’ reactions to abusive supervision. Also, for the first time, CSE was tested as a moderator between abusive supervision and self-blame. Finally, in response to previous calls for research, the moderating role of subordinates’ power distance orientation in the relationship between self-blame and guilt was investigated.

Evidence Based Health Policy Management and Economics
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.