Complete waveform comparison of post-Newtonian and numerical relativity in eccentric orbits

This study presents a thorough comparative analysis between post-Newtonian (PN) and numerically relativistic (NR) waveforms in eccentric orbits, covering nonspinning and spin-aligned configurations. The comparison examines frequency, amplitude, and phase characteristics of various harmonic modes, including $(\ensuremath{\ell},m)=(2,2),(2,1),(3,3),(3,2),(4,4),(5,5)$ modes. The study utilizes eccentric PN waveforms based on 3PN quasi-Keplerian parametrization with 3PN radiative reaction, surpassing Newtonian quadrupole moment with higher-order moments. NR waveforms from RIT and SXS catalogs span mass ratios from $1/4$ to 1, eccentricities up to 0.45, and durations exceeding $17000M$ across nonspinning and spin-aligned configurations. Focusing on the (2, 2) mode, frequency comparisons between quadrupole and higher-order moments of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Psi}}}_{4}^{22}$ and ${h}^{22}$ were conducted. Amplitude comparisons revealed superior accuracy in quadrupole moments of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Psi}}}_{4}^{22}$. Analysis of total 180 sets of eccentric waveforms showed increasing fitting residuals with rising eccentricity, correlating with smaller mass ratios. Comparisons of initial eccentricity from PN fitting, 3PN quasi-Keplerian parametrization, and RIT/SXS catalogs revealed alignment discrepancies. Frequency, phase, and amplitude comparisons of (2, 2) modes show consistent inspiral behavior between PN and NR, with divergences near merger for nonspinning PN and pre-$200M$ for spin-aligned PN. Average errors of frequency, phase, and amplitude up to $200M$ premerger amplify with increasing eccentricity. Average errors for eccentricities of 0--0.2 are below 3% for frequency, 0.2 for phase, and 6% for amplitude. For eccentricities of 0.2--0.4, errors increase. The higher-order modes demonstrate consistent trends for frequency and phase, and with increased amplitude errors, underscoring the self-consistency of the PN fitting process. Fittings on three RIT eccentric waveforms with low mass ratios highlight deviation between PN and NR for such scenarios. Refinements in PN and NR accuracy, especially at higher orders, and small mass ratios are essential for precise gravitational wave templates in eccentric orbits, reducing systematic errors in parameter estimation and advancing gravitational wave detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.064018
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complete waveform comparison of post-Newtonian and numerical relativity in eccentric orbits

Yuan-Chuan Zou, H. Wang, Xiaolin Liu, Zhao Li et al.
4 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
4.62
article

Complete waveform comparison of post-Newtonian and numerical relativity in eccentric orbits

Yuan-Chuan Zou, H. Wang, Xiaolin Liu, Zhao Li, Qingwen Wu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study presents a thorough comparative analysis between post-Newtonian (PN) and numerically relativistic (NR) waveforms in eccentric orbits, covering nonspinning and spin-aligned configurations. The comparison examines frequency, amplitude, and phase characteristics of various harmonic modes, including $(\ensuremath{\ell},m)=(2,2),(2,1),(3,3),(3,2),(4,4),(5,5)$ modes. The study utilizes eccentric PN waveforms based on 3PN quasi-Keplerian parametrization with 3PN radiative reaction, surpassing Newtonian quadrupole moment with higher-order moments. NR waveforms from RIT and SXS catalogs span mass ratios from $1/4$ to 1, eccentricities up to 0.45, and durations exceeding $17000M$ across nonspinning and spin-aligned configurations. Focusing on the (2, 2) mode, frequency comparisons between quadrupole and higher-order moments of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Psi}}}_{4}^{22}$ and ${h}^{22}$ were conducted. Amplitude comparisons revealed superior accuracy in quadrupole moments of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Psi}}}_{4}^{22}$. Analysis of total 180 sets of eccentric waveforms showed increasing fitting residuals with rising eccentricity, correlating with smaller mass ratios. Comparisons of initial eccentricity from PN fitting, 3PN quasi-Keplerian parametrization, and RIT/SXS catalogs revealed alignment discrepancies. Frequency, phase, and amplitude comparisons of (2, 2) modes show consistent inspiral behavior between PN and NR, with divergences near merger for nonspinning PN and pre-$200M$ for spin-aligned PN. Average errors of frequency, phase, and amplitude up to $200M$ premerger amplify with increasing eccentricity. Average errors for eccentricities of 0--0.2 are below 3% for frequency, 0.2 for phase, and 6% for amplitude. For eccentricities of 0.2--0.4, errors increase. The higher-order modes demonstrate consistent trends for frequency and phase, and with increased amplitude errors, underscoring the self-consistency of the PN fitting process. Fittings on three RIT eccentric waveforms with low mass ratios highlight deviation between PN and NR for such scenarios. Refinements in PN and NR accuracy, especially at higher orders, and small mass ratios are essential for precise gravitational wave templates in eccentric orbits, reducing systematic errors in parameter estimation and advancing gravitational wave detection.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(6)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Kyoto University (JP), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
China Scholarship Council, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.